» Articles » PMID: 30923937

The Skin Dose of Pelvic Radiographs Since 1896

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Mar 30
PMID 30923937
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To derive conversions of antiquated exposure data into modern equivalents and to apply these in the assessment of the skin dose of pelvic radiographs since 1896.

Methods: The literature 1896-2018 was searched for implicit and explicit dose information. The early implicit dose data contained now obsolete descriptions of radiation quality and quantity for long since disappeared X-ray systems of limited efficiency. Converting the old information into modern specifications was achieved using contemporary data and computer simulations. Final dose calculations were done with modern software. Explicit radiation doses of later date reported in old quantities and units were adapted according to current recommendations.

Results: For the period before 1927 conversion algorithms for spark gap data and penetrometer hardnesses to high voltage could be derived. Electrical and X-ray efficiencies of several old röntgen systems were determined. Together they allowed reconstruction of 53 doses. After 1927 doses were generally explicitly specified; 114 were retrieved. Although an enormous spread was observed, the average skin dose was reduced by a factor of about 400.

Conclusions: Antiquated exposure data were successfully used for dose reconstruction. Extreme dose variability was a constant. Efforts to cut down doses were effective as skin doses went down from sub-erythema values to about one milligray.

Citing Articles

European consensus on patient contact shielding.

Hiles P, Gilligan P, Damilakis J, Briers E, Candela-Juan C, Faj D Insights Imaging. 2021; 12(1):194.

PMID: 34939154 PMC: 8695402. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-01085-4.


Gonad shielding in pelvic radiography: modern optimised X-ray systems might allow its discontinuation.

Jeukens C, Kutterer G, Kicken P, Frantzen M, van Engelshoven J, Wildberger J Insights Imaging. 2020; 11(1):15.

PMID: 32030539 PMC: 7005227. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0828-1.

References
1.
Mitchell J, Haybittle J . Carcinoma of the skin appearing 49 years after a single diagnostic roentgen exposure; report of a case. Acta Radiol (Stockh). 1955; 44(4):345-50. DOI: 10.3109/00016925509171295. View

2.
Stewart F, Akleyev A, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry J, Kleiman N, MacVittie T . ICRP publication 118: ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs--threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012; 41(1-2):1-322. DOI: 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.02.001. View

3.
Kotre C, Little B . Patient and staff radiation doses from early radiological examinations (1899-1902). Br J Radiol. 2006; 79(946):837-42. DOI: 10.1259/bjr/16982267. View

4.
BILLINGS M, Norman A, Greenfield M . Gonad dose during routine roentgenography. Radiology. 1957; 69(1):37-41. DOI: 10.1148/69.1.37. View

5.
. 3 quantities and units for measurement and calculation in medical x-ray imaging. J ICRU. 2013; 5(2):25-34. DOI: 10.1093/jicru/ndi025. View