» Articles » PMID: 30921225

Short- and Long-term Outcomes of Totally Robotic Versus Robotic-assisted Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Mar 29
PMID 30921225
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Totally robotic right hemicolectomy (TRRH) is a novel alternative surgical method used for the treatment of colon cancer. The aim of this study was to compare both the short-and long-term outcomes of TRRH and robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) for the treatment of colon cancer.We performed a 1:2 matched propensity score analysis. We then retrospectively analyzed all procedures (64 cases TRRH and 128 cases RARH) carried out by a single surgeon between December 4, 2014 and June 20, 2018 at a large center. Both short-and long-term surgical outcomes were compared between 2 different groups.Based on the propensity score matching, we selected 64 patients that had undergone TRRH treatment and 128 patients who had undergone RARH treatment. The preoperative clinical-pathological characteristics were well matched between the 2 groups. We observed no significant differences between the 2 groups in postoperative pathological outcomes. The mean operative time was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group compared to the RARH group (168.2 ± 9.1 minutes vs 153.4 ± 7.4 minutes, P = .034). The mean operative incision length was found to be significantly longer in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (4.5 ± 0.6 cm vs 6.9 ± 1.1 cm, P = .023). Postoperative pain score (visual analog scale at day 1) was found to be significantly lower in the TRRH group than in the RARH group (2.9 ± 1.3 vs 4.1 ± 2.1, P = .005). The time to pass flatus was observed to be statistically lower in the TRRH group (P = .042). We observed 3 twists of mesentery in the RARH group, while none were observed in the TRRH group (P < .050). Both the 3-year overall survival (TRRH [91.6%] vs RARH [89.2%], P = .467) and the 3-year disease-free survival (TRRH [81.4%] vs RARH [78.2%], P = .551) were determined to be comparable between the 2 groups studied here.We show that TRRH is a safe and feasible treatment option for colon cancer patients in terms of both short- and long-term outcomes. High-volume, randomized, controlled trials with sufficient follow-up studies will need to be carried out in order to confirm this rationale.

Citing Articles

Robotic versus laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a systematic review of the evidence.

Meyer J, Meyer E, Meurette G, Liot E, Toso C, Ris F J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):116.

PMID: 38466445 PMC: 10927893. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01862-5.


Right colectomy from open to robotic - a single-center experience with functional outcomes in a learning-curve setting.

Hirschburger M, Schneider R, Kraenzlein S, Padberg W, Hecker A, Reichert M Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022; 407(7):2915-2927.

PMID: 35678902 PMC: 9640414. DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02576-8.


Postoperative complications after robotic resection of colorectal cancer: An analysis based on 5-year experience at a large-scale center.

Huang Z, Zhou Z, Shi H, Li T, Ye S World J Gastrointest Surg. 2022; 13(12):1660-1672.

PMID: 35070071 PMC: 8727186. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i12.1660.


Ileo-colic intra-corporeal anastomosis during robotic right colectomy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of different techniques.

Guadagni S, Palmeri M, Bianchini M, Gianardi D, Furbetta N, Minichilli F Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021; 36(6):1097-1110.

PMID: 33486533 PMC: 8119253. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-021-03850-9.


The art of robotic colonic resection: a review of progress in the past 5 years.

Liu H, Xu M, Liu R, Jia B, Zhao Z Updates Surg. 2021; 73(3):1037-1048.

PMID: 33481214 PMC: 8184527. DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00969-2.

References
1.
Milone M, Elmore U, Di Salvo E, Delrio P, Bucci L, Ferulano G . Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis. Results from a multicentre comparative study on 512 right-sided colorectal cancers. Surg Endosc. 2014; 29(8):2314-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3950-7. View

2.
Raftopoulos I, Courcoulas A, Blumberg D . Should completely intracorporeal anastomosis be considered in obese patients who undergo laparoscopic colectomy for benign or malignant disease of the colon?. Surgery. 2006; 140(4):675-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2006.07.013. View

3.
Rawlings A, Woodland J, Crawford D . Telerobotic surgery for right and sigmoid colectomies: 30 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(11):1713-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0771-8. View

4.
Stein S, Bergamaschi R . Extracorporeal versus intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2012; 17 Suppl 1:S35-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0937-z. View

5.
Desouza A, Prasad L, Park J, Marecik S, Blumetti J, Abcarian H . Robotic assistance in right hemicolectomy: is there a role?. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010; 53(7):1000-6. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d32096. View