Beta-d-Glucan for Diagnosing Pneumonia: a Direct Comparison Between the Wako β-Glucan Assay and the Fungitell Assay

Measuring serum beta-d-glucan (BDG) is a useful tool for supporting a quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based diagnosis of suspected pneumonia (PCP) with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Since the 2000s, the Fungitell assay was the only BDG assay which was FDA cleared and Conformité Européenne (CE) marked. However, the Wako β-glucan test was also recently CE marked and commercialized. We analyzed archived sera from 116 PCP cases (who were considered to have PCP based on compatible clinical and radiological findings plus a BAL fluid qPCR threshold cycle value of ≤28) and 114 controls (those with a BAL fluid qPCR threshold cycle value of >45 and no invasive fungal infection) using the Fungitell and Wako assays in parallel and assessed their diagnostic performance using the manufacturer's proposed cutoffs of 80 pg/ml and 11 pg/ml, respectively. We found the Wako assay to be more specific (0.98 versus 0.87,  < 0.001) and the Fungitell assay to be more sensitive (0.78 versus 0.85,  = 0.039) at the proposed cutoffs. Overall performance, as determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, was similar for both assays. We determined a new Wako assay cutoff (3.616 pg/ml) to match the sensitivity of the Fungitell assay (0.88 at a cutoff of ≥60 pg/ml). Using this newly proposed cutoff, the specificity of the Wako assay was significantly better than that of the Fungitell assay (0.89 versus 0.82,  = 0.011). In conclusion, the Wako assay performed excellently compared to the Fungitell assay for the diagnosis of presumed PCP based on qPCR. In addition, contrary to the Fungitell assay, the Wako assay allows for single-sample testing with lower inter- and intrarun variability. Finally, we propose an optimized cutoff for the Wako assay to reliably exclude PCP.