» Articles » PMID: 30915903

Interobserver Variability (between Radiation Oncologist and Radiation Therapist) in Tumor Bed Contouring After Breast-conserving Surgery

Overview
Journal Tumori
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Oncology
Date 2019 Mar 28
PMID 30915903
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine interobserver variability between the radiation oncologist (RTO) and the radiation therapist (RTT) in delineating the tumor bed (TB) in early breast cancer (BC).

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who received a radiotherapy boost to the TB. In a first group, the clinical target volume (CTV) for the boost was the surgical bed, defined by using surgical clips. In a second group, the CTV was defined by identifying a seroma cavity or a metallic find on the scar. These contours were compared in terms of volume, number of slices, and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).

Results: Forty patients were assessed: 20 had surgical clips (group 1) while the other 20 had none (group 2). There was no difference in the number of slices contoured by the 2 operators for group 1, but a statistically significant difference emerged in the volumes: the RTT identified a TB that was a mean 45% smaller than the one identified by the RTO. Random differences were found between the 2 operators for group 2. The TBs delineated for this group were significantly larger (<0.05) than those identified by the RTT for group 1. The mean Dice value between the RTO's and the RTT's TBs was 0.69±0.07 (range 0.53-0.81) for group 1 and 0.37±0.18 (range 0-0.58) for group 2 (<0.05).

Conclusions: This study showed that the use of clips coincided with less interoperator variability. With appropriate training, the RTT may play an important part in the multidisciplinary radiotherapy team.

Citing Articles

From novice to Expert: Reducing Breast Imaging rejection rates through physician mentorship in Advanced Practice Radiation therapy.

Starrs C, Rabinowitz S, Moshier E, Green S Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2024; 32:100279.

PMID: 39444414 PMC: 11497484. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100279.


Online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy: Conformity of contour adaptation for prostate cancer, rectal cancer and lymph node oligometastases among radiation therapists and radiation oncologists.

Rasing M, Sikkes G, Vissers N, Kotte A, Boudewijn J, Doornaert P Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2022; 23:33-40.

PMID: 36090011 PMC: 9460551. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2022.08.004.


Evaluation of delineating the target volume by radiation therapists in breast cancer patients.

van Pelt V, Gerrets S, Simoes R, Elkhuizen P, Janssen T Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2021; 17:78-81.

PMID: 34007911 PMC: 8110937. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2021.01.001.


Radiation therapy technologists' involvement and opinion in research: A national survey in Italy.

Piro D, Boldrini L, Cornacchione P, Votta C, Bianchi M, Balducci M Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2020; 15:11-14.

PMID: 32613093 PMC: 7322338. DOI: 10.1016/j.tipsro.2020.05.002.