» Articles » PMID: 30914667

Local-Field Corrections As a Regularization Method for the Spin-Boson Model

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Mar 28
PMID 30914667
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The decoherence rate of a 'central spin' in a bosonic bath of magnetic fluctuations is computed using the spin-boson model. The magnetic fluctuations are treated in a fully quantum mechanical way by using the macroscopic quantum electrodynamics formalism and are expressed in terms of the classical electromagnetic Green's function of the system. The resulting frequency integral formally diverges but it can be regularized by applying real-cavity, local-field corrections to the location of the 'central spin'. This results in a cut-off function in terms of the magnetic permeability of the background material that leads to convergence at both high and low frequencies. This cut-off function appears naturally from the formalism and thus removes the need to rely on ad-hoc arguments to justify the form of the cut-off function. Furthermore, the magnetic permeability and the nature of interactions in quantum electrodynamics illuminate the connection between the two main models of 'central spin' decoherence, the spin-boson model and the spin-bath model, demonstrating how the two very different models are able to correctly model the same underlying physics.

References
1.
Adolphs J, Renger T . How proteins trigger excitation energy transfer in the FMO complex of green sulfur bacteria. Biophys J. 2006; 91(8):2778-97. PMC: 1578489. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.105.079483. View

2.
HUTTNER , BARNETT . Quantization of the electromagnetic field in dielectrics. Phys Rev A. 1992; 46(7):4306-4322. DOI: 10.1103/physreva.46.4306. View

3.
Olbrich C, Strumpfer J, Schulten K, Kleinekathofer U . Theory and Simulation of the Environmental Effects on FMO Electronic Transitions. J Phys Chem Lett. 2011; 2011(2):1771-1776. PMC: 3144632. DOI: 10.1021/jz2007676. View

4.
Fiedler J, Thiyam P, Kurumbail A, Burger F, Walter M, Persson C . Effective Polarizability Models. J Phys Chem A. 2017; 121(51):9742-9751. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b10159. View

5.
Buhmann S, Scheel S . Thermal Casimir versus Casimir-Polder forces: equilibrium and nonequilibrium forces. Phys Rev Lett. 2008; 100(25):253201. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.253201. View