» Articles » PMID: 30913463

Tumor Size Improves the Accuracy of the Prognostic Prediction of Lymph Node-Negative Gastric Cancer

Overview
Journal J Surg Res
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Mar 27
PMID 30913463
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Tumor size has been regarded as the "T" stage of many solid tumors because of its effect on prognosis. However, the prognostic impact of tumor size in gastric cancer (GC) is still controversial.

Materials And Methods: A total of 436 patients with curatively resected GC and those without lymph node metastasis in our center were retrospectively enrolled. The appropriate cutoff points for tumor size were determined. Potential prognostic factors were analyzed. In addition, a pathological tumor-size (pTS) classification system was proposed to evaluate the superiority of its prognostic prediction of node-negative GC patients compared with that of the pT staging system.

Results: The ideal cutoff points for tumor size were 4 and 8 cm. In the multivariate analysis, tumor size was identified as an independent prognostic factor for node-negative GC patients after surgery, as was pT stage. The pTS classification was found to be more appropriate for predicting the overall survival of node-negative GC patients after curative surgery than pT stage, and the -2 log-likelihood of the pTS classification (1680.782) was smaller than the value of pT (1695.239).

Conclusions: As an independent prognostic factor, tumor size should be incorporated into the pT staging system to enhance the accuracy of the prognostic prediction of node-negative GC patients.

Citing Articles

Risk factors of positive lymph node metastasis after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer and construction of prediction models.

Dai G, Chen M, Zhu D, Cai Y, Gao M Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(11):5216-5229.

PMID: 39659931 PMC: 11626280. DOI: 10.62347/PEDV7297.


Development and validation of nomograms for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in elderly patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Sun Y, Li Z, Tian Y, Gao C, Liang B, Cao S BMC Gastroenterol. 2023; 23(1):117.

PMID: 37041468 PMC: 10091668. DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02749-9.


Family history of malignant tumor is a predictor of gastric cancer prognosis: Incorporation into a nomogram.

Wang F, Fan L, Zhao Q, Liu Y, Zhang Z, Wang D Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(35):e30141.

PMID: 36107576 PMC: 9439747. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030141.


Tumor Characteristics Associated with Lymph Node Metastasis and Prognosis in Patients with ERBB2-Positive Gastric Cancer.

Xu R, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Chen K, Wang Z J Oncol. 2022; 2022:7592046.

PMID: 36059809 PMC: 9436560. DOI: 10.1155/2022/7592046.


The prognostic role of tumor size in stage T1 gastric cancer.

Chen Y, Jia Y, Peng Z, Wang G World J Surg Oncol. 2022; 20(1):135.

PMID: 35477526 PMC: 9044763. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02596-0.