» Articles » PMID: 30912801

Evidence for Faster X Chromosome Evolution in Spiders

Overview
Journal Mol Biol Evol
Specialty Biology
Date 2019 Mar 27
PMID 30912801
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In species with chromosomal sex determination, X chromosomes are predicted to evolve faster than autosomes because of positive selection on recessive alleles or weak purifying selection. We investigated X chromosome evolution in Stegodyphus spiders that differ in mating system, sex ratio, and population dynamics. We assigned scaffolds to X chromosomes and autosomes using a novel method based on flow cytometry of sperm cells and reduced representation sequencing. We estimated coding substitution patterns (dN/dS) in a subsocial outcrossing species (S. africanus) and its social inbreeding and female-biased sister species (S. mimosarum), and found evidence for faster-X evolution in both species. X chromosome-to-autosome diversity (piX/piA) ratios were estimated in multiple populations. The average piX/piA estimates of S. africanus (0.57 [95% CI: 0.55-0.60]) was lower than the neutral expectation of 0.75, consistent with more hitchhiking events on X-linked loci and/or a lower X chromosome mutation rate, and we provide evidence in support of both. The social species S. mimosarum has a significantly higher piX/piA ratio (0.72 [95% CI: 0.65-0.79]) in agreement with its female-biased sex ratio. Stegodyphus mimosarum also have different piX/piA estimates among populations, which we interpret as evidence for recurrent founder events. Simulations show that recurrent founder events are expected to decrease the piX/piA estimates in S. mimosarum, thus underestimating the true effect of female-biased sex ratios. Finally, we found lower synonymous divergence on X chromosomes in both species, and the male-to-female substitution ratio to be higher than 1, indicating a higher mutation rate in males.

Citing Articles

Sex Chromosome Evolution: Hallmarks and Question Marks.

Saunders P, Muyle A Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(11).

PMID: 39417444 PMC: 11542634. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae218.


Recent secondary contact, genome-wide admixture, and asymmetric introgression of neo-sex chromosomes between two Pacific island bird species.

Shogren E, Sardell J, Muirhead C, Marti E, Cooper E, Moyle R PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(8):e1011360.

PMID: 39172766 PMC: 11340901. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011360.


Impact of pre-copulatory sexual cannibalism on genetic diversity and efficacy of selection.

Martinez Villar M, Bechsgaard J, Bilde T, Albo M, Tomasco I Biol Lett. 2024; 20(5):20230505.

PMID: 38746981 PMC: 11285751. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0505.


Chromosome-Aware Phylogenomics of Assassin Bugs (Hemiptera: Reduvioidea) Elucidates Ancient Gene Conflict.

Knyshov A, Gordon E, Masonick P, Castillo S, Forero D, Hoey-Chamberlain R Mol Biol Evol. 2023; 40(8).

PMID: 37494292 PMC: 10411492. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msad168.


Slower-X: reduced efficiency of selection in the early stages of X chromosome evolution.

Mrnjavac A, Khudiakova K, Barton N, Vicoso B Evol Lett. 2023; 7(1):4-12.

PMID: 37065438 PMC: 10091493. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrac004.


References
1.
Betancourt A, Presgraves D, Swanson W . A test for faster X evolution in Drosophila. Mol Biol Evol. 2002; 19(10):1816-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004006. View

2.
Andres J, Morrow E . The origin of interlocus sexual conflict: is sex-linkage important?. J Evol Biol. 2003; 16(2):219-23. DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00525.x. View

3.
Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K . APE: Analyses of Phylogenetics and Evolution in R language. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(2):289-90. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg412. View

4.
Supek F, Vlahovicek K . INCA: synonymous codon usage analysis and clustering by means of self-organizing map. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20(14):2329-30. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth238. View

5.
Counterman B, Ortiz-Barrientos D, Noor M . Using comparative genomic data to test for fast-X evolution. Evolution. 2004; 58(3):656-60. View