» Articles » PMID: 30906185

Statistical and Cooperative Learning in Reading: An Artificial Orthography Learning Study

Overview
Journal Sci Stud Read
Date 2019 Mar 26
PMID 30906185
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper reports two experiments in which the artificial orthography paradigm was used to investigate the mechanisms underlying learning to read. In each experiment, participants were taught the meanings and pronunications of words written in an unfamiliar orthography and the statistical structure of the mapping between written and spoken forms (O-P) was manipulated independently of the mapping between written forms and their meanings (O-S). Our results support three main conclusions. First, the statistical structure of O-P and O-S mappings determined how easily each of those mappings was learned, suggesting that the learning of both mappings engages a common statistical learning mechnism. Second, learning to read is a cooperative process, in that learning in any particular component of the reading system is influenced by knowledge stored in the rest of the system. Finally, knowledge of sublexical regularities can be acquired as the result of exposure to words embodying those regularities.

Citing Articles

Seeking the neural representation of statistical properties in print during implicit processing of visual words.

Liu J, Fan T, Chen Y, Zhao J NPJ Sci Learn. 2023; 8(1):60.

PMID: 38102191 PMC: 10724295. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-023-00209-3.


The Role of Neural and Genetic Processes in Learning to Read and Specific Reading Disabilities: Implications for Instruction.

Church J, Grigorenko E, Fletcher J Read Res Q. 2023; 58(2):203-219.

PMID: 37456924 PMC: 10348696. DOI: 10.1002/rrq.439.


Effects of individual and group metacognitive prompts on EFL reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning.

Teng F, Reynolds B PLoS One. 2019; 14(5):e0215902.

PMID: 31116739 PMC: 6530832. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215902.

References
1.
Rueckl J, Raveh M . The influence of morphological regularities on the dynamics of a connectionist network. Brain Lang. 1999; 68(1-2):110-7. DOI: 10.1006/brln.1999.2106. View

2.
Harm M, Seidenberg M . Phonology, reading acquisition, and dyslexia: insights from connectionist models. Psychol Rev. 1999; 106(3):491-528. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.106.3.491. View

3.
Shu H, Chen X, Anderson R, Wu N, Xuan Y . Properties of school Chinese: implications for learning to read. Child Dev. 2003; 74(1):27-47. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8624.00519. View

4.
Bitan T, Karni A . Alphabetical knowledge from whole words training: effects of explicit instruction and implicit experience on learning script segmentation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2003; 16(3):323-37. DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(02)00301-4. View

5.
Seymour P, Aro M, Erskine J . Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. Br J Psychol. 2003; 94(Pt 2):143-74. DOI: 10.1348/000712603321661859. View