» Articles » PMID: 30905993

When and How to Operate Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis?

Overview
Journal Indian J Orthop
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Mar 26
PMID 30905993
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) are an entity with an increasing frequency. The characteristics of these fractures are different from pelvic ring fractures in younger adults. There is a low energy instead of a high energy trauma mechanism. Due to a specific and consistent decrease of bone mineral density, typical fractures in the anterior and posterior pelvic ring occur. Bilateral sacral ala fractures are frequent. A new classification system distinguishes between four categories with increasing loss of stability. The subtypes represent different localizations of fractures. The primary goal of treatment is restoring mobility and independency. Depending on the amount of instability, conservative or surgical treatment is recommended. The operative technique should be as less invasive as possible. When the broken posterior pelvic ring is fixed operatively, a surgical fixation of the anterior pelvic ring should be considered as well. FFP Type I can be treated conservatively. In many cases, FFP Type II can also be treated conservatively. When conservative treatment fails, percutaneous fixation is performed. FFP Type III and FFP Type IV are treated operatively. The choice of the operation technique is depending on the localization of the fracture. Iliosacral screw osteosynthesis, transsacral bar osteosynthesis, transiliac internal fixation, and iliolumbar fixation are alternatives for stabilization of the posterior pelvic ring. Plate osteosynthesis, retrograde transpubic screw, and anterior internal fixation are alternatives for stabilization of the anterior pelvic ring. Postoperatively, early mobilization, with weight bearing as tolerated, is started. Simultaneously, bone metabolism is also analyzed and its defects compensated. Medical comorbidities should be identified and treated with the help of a multidisciplinary team.

Citing Articles

Dual-energy CT in diagnosing sacral fractures: assessment of diagnostic accuracy and intra- and inter-rater reliabilities.

Oda T, Kitada S, Hirase H, Iwasa K, Niikura T Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):35.

PMID: 39853415 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02673-x.


Bilateral Iliosacral and Transsacral Screws Are Biomechanically Favorable and Reduce the Risk for Fracture Progression in Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-A Finite Element Analysis.

Lodde M, Klimek M, Herbst E, Peez C, Riesenbeck O, Raschke M Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 12(1.

PMID: 39851301 PMC: 11762612. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12010027.


Treatment of Type IV Fragility Fractures of Pelvis With Robotic-Assisted Minimally Invasive Triangular Fixation.

Tian W, Jia F, Zheng J, Liu Z, Jia J Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(3):848-857.

PMID: 39726284 PMC: 11872377. DOI: 10.1111/os.14338.


Augmented ilio-sacral screws for the treatment of fragility pelvic fractures: review of literature, presentation of a novel low-cost technique, and clinical results of a case series.

Castro H, Carmona M, Zamora T, Klaber I, Botello E, Faundez J Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):29.

PMID: 39607588 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04150-y.


The role of sarcopenia in fragility fractures of the pelvis - is sarcopenia an underestimated risk factor?.

Mair O, Neumann J, Rittstieg P, Muller M, Biberthaler P, Hanschen M BMC Geriatr. 2024; 24(1):461.

PMID: 38797837 PMC: 11129451. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05082-2.


References
1.
Babayev M, Lachmann E, Nagler W . The controversy surrounding sacral insufficiency fractures: to ambulate or not to ambulate?. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 79(4):404-9. DOI: 10.1097/00002060-200007000-00014. View

2.
Morris R, Sonibare A, Green D, Masud T . Closed pelvic fractures: characteristics and outcomes in older patients admitted to medical and geriatric wards. Postgrad Med J. 2000; 76(900):646-50. PMC: 1741752. DOI: 10.1136/pmj.76.900.646. View

3.
Taillandier J, Langue F, Alemanni M, Taillandier-Heriche E . Mortality and functional outcomes of pelvic insufficiency fractures in older patients. Joint Bone Spine. 2003; 70(4):287-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1297-319x(03)00015-0. View

4.
Mason W, Khan S, James C, Chesser T, Ward A . Complications of temporary and definitive external fixation of pelvic ring injuries. Injury. 2005; 36(5):599-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2004.11.016. View

5.
Schildhauer T, Bellabarba C, Nork S, Barei D, Routt Jr M, Chapman J . Decompression and lumbopelvic fixation for sacral fracture-dislocations with spino-pelvic dissociation. J Orthop Trauma. 2006; 20(7):447-57. DOI: 10.1097/00005131-200608000-00001. View