» Articles » PMID: 30904877

The Influence of Complexity: a Bibliometric Analysis of Complexity Science in Healthcare

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Mar 25
PMID 30904877
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To analyse trends in the academic literature applying complexity science to healthcare, focusing specifically on bibliometric characteristics and indicators of influence.

Design: This study reports a bibliometric analysis via a systematic search of the academic literature applying complexity science to healthcare.

Method: A search of four academic databases was performed on 19 April 2018. Article details were downloaded and screened against inclusion criteria (peer-reviewed journal articles applying complexity science to healthcare). Publication and content data were then collected from included articles, with analysis focusing on trends over time in the types and topics of articles, and where they are published. We also analysed the influence of this body of work through citation and network analyses.

Results: Articles on complexity science in healthcare were published in 268 journals, though a much smaller subset was responsible for a substantial proportion of this literature. USA contributed the largest number of articles, followed by the UK, Canada and Australia. Over time, the number of empirical and review articles increased, relative to non-empirical contributions. However, in general, non-empirical literature was more influential, with a series of introductory conceptual papers being the most influential based on both overall citations and their use as index references within a citation network. The most common topics of focus were health systems and organisations generally, and education, with recent uptake in research, policy, and change and improvement.

Conclusions: This study identified changes in the types of articles on complexity science in healthcare published over time, and their content. There was evidence to suggest a shift from conceptual work to the application of concrete improvement strategies and increasingly in-depth examination of complex healthcare systems. We also identified variation in the influence of this literature at article level, and to a lesser extent by topic of focus.

Citing Articles

Mature-Aged People in the Rural Health Workforce System: A Systems Modelling Approach.

Quilliam C, Thompson J, Crawford N, McKinstry C, Chambers A, Bhat R Aust J Rural Health. 2025; 33(1):e13222.

PMID: 39803775 PMC: 11848814. DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13222.


The nursing practice environment and hospital sociotechnical complexity: a mixed-methods study.

Riboldi C, Gasparino R, Wegner W, Henriqson E, Saurin T, de Magalhaes A Rev Bras Enferm. 2024; 77(6):e20230315.

PMID: 39699355 PMC: 11654510. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0315.


If things were simple, word would have gotten around. Can complexity science help us improve pediatric research?.

Fustolo-Gunnink S, de Boode W, Dekkers O, Greisen G, Lopriore E, Russo F Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39609614 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03677-4.


Workplace interventions focusing on how to plan, organize and design the work environment in hospital settings: A systematic review.

Haraldsson P, Nylander E, Jonker D, Ros A, Areskoug Josefsson K Work. 2024; 78(2):331-348.

PMID: 38277328 PMC: 11191506. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-230205.


Current definitions of advanced multimorbidity: a protocol for a scoping review.

Bowers S, Black P, McCheyne L, Wilson D, Mills S, Agrawal U BMJ Open. 2023; 13(11):e076903.

PMID: 38035744 PMC: 10689385. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076903.


References
1.
Rusoja E, Haynie D, Sievers J, Mustafee N, Nelson F, Reynolds M . Thinking about complexity in health: A systematic review of the key systems thinking and complexity ideas in health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018; 24(3):600-606. DOI: 10.1111/jep.12856. View

2.
Ssengooba F, McPake B, Palmer N . Why performance-based contracting failed in Uganda--an "open-box" evaluation of a complex health system intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2012; 75(2):377-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.02.050. View

3.
Sturmberg J, Martin C, Katerndahl D . Systems and complexity thinking in the general practice literature: an integrative, historical narrative review. Ann Fam Med. 2014; 12(1):66-74. PMC: 3896540. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1593. View

4.
Frye A, Hemmer P . Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE guide no. 67. Med Teach. 2012; 34(5):e288-99. DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637. View

5.
Crabtree B, Miller W, Stange K . Understanding practice from the ground up. J Fam Pract. 2001; 50(10):881-7. View