» Articles » PMID: 30902152

Is Muscle Growth a Mechanism for Increasing Strength?

Overview
Journal Med Hypotheses
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Mar 24
PMID 30902152
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Skeletal muscle hypertrophy commonly occurs with repeated bouts of resistance exercise as well as following the administration of exogenous drugs. This increase in muscle size is thought to be mechanistically important for the increase in muscle function. However, at present, there is no experimental evidence that would support any paradigm in which muscle hypertrophy is a mechanism for increasing strength with exercise. Therefore, it seems reasonable to also question the importance of changes in muscle size for changes in muscle strength (function) following exogenous drugs as well as aging, where both muscle size and strength decrease. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether changes in muscle size contribute to changes in voluntary strength following exercise, pharmaceutical interventions, and aging. We also aim to provide potential mechanisms (central and peripheral) for the change in strength as well as outline study designs to better address this question. Herein, we suggest that there are dissociations between changes in muscle size and strength following exercise, anabolic drug administration, and aging (to a point). These dissociations occur throughout the literature, suggesting that these changes may be completely separate phenomena. We are not dismissing the potential importance of maintaining muscle mass, particularly in clinical populations. What we are suggesting, however, is that muscle function may not necessarily be improved by these exercise or pharmacological induced increases in muscle size. Exploring mechanisms and explanations beyond just changes in muscle size may improve therapy targeted at improving muscle function.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Traditional and Advanced Resistance Training Paradigms on Muscle Hypertrophy in Trained Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fonseca P, Ide B, Oranchuk D, Marocolo M, Simim M, Roberts M Transl Sports Med. 2024; 2023:9507977.

PMID: 38654909 PMC: 11022786. DOI: 10.1155/2023/9507977.


The influence of considering individual resistance training variables as a whole on muscle strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

Lyristakis P, Wundersitz D, Zadow E, Mnatzaganian G, Gordon B PLoS One. 2022; 17(1):e0262674.

PMID: 35051219 PMC: 8775318. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262674.


The Minimum Effective Training Dose Required for 1RM Strength in Powerlifters.

Androulakis-Korakakis P, Michalopoulos N, Fisher J, Keogh J, Loenneke J, Helms E Front Sports Act Living. 2021; 3:713655.

PMID: 34527944 PMC: 8435792. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2021.713655.


A Retrospective Analysis to Determine Whether Training-Induced Changes in Muscle Thickness Mediate Changes in Muscle Strength.

Jessee M, Dankel S, Bentley J, Loenneke J Sports Med. 2021; 51(9):1999-2010.

PMID: 33881748 DOI: 10.1007/s40279-021-01470-5.


Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women.

Hill E, Housh T, Keller J, Smith C, Anders J, Schmidt R Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021; 121(5):1473-1485.

PMID: 33638690 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-021-04627-2.