» Articles » PMID: 30899733

Selection of a Set of Biomarkers and Comparisons of Biological Age Estimation Models for Korean Men

Overview
Journal J Exerc Rehabil
Date 2019 Mar 23
PMID 30899733
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Biological age (BA) represents the rate of the senescence with a set of biomarkers. The BA prediction models have not been compared to obtain an optimal BA prediction model with BA biomarkers for Korean men. The study aims to obtain a set of BA biomarkers and compare three of the reported statistical approaches for an optimal BA prediction model. The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys data of 2009 to 2011 were used to select six BA biomarkers from 940 healthy subjects aged between 30 to 80 years. The multiple linear regression (MLR), principal component analysis (PCA), and Klemera and Doubal methods (KDM) were used to obtain three BA prediction models. Correlation coefficients () with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and regression slopes were assessed. One of the Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimensions, mobility, was compared for feasibility test of each BA models. KDM showed greatest correlation (=0.88 [<0.05]) with smallest 95% CI and regression slope (1.00). PCA also showed strong correlation (=0.79 [<0.05]) with small 95% CI and regression slope (0.94). MLR (=0.68 [<0.05]) showed over and underestimated BA results at the end of the age spectrum. Estimations of BA were most reliable with KDM. The PCA and MLR approaches were comparatively simple to devise for Korean men.

Citing Articles

Biomarkers selection and mathematical modeling in biological age estimation.

Bafei S, Shen C NPJ Aging. 2023; 9(1):13.

PMID: 37393295 PMC: 10314900. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-023-00110-8.


Progress in biological age research.

Li Z, Zhang W, Duan Y, Niu Y, Chen Y, Liu X Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1074274.

PMID: 37124811 PMC: 10130645. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1074274.


Biological age for chronic kidney disease patients using index model.

Abu Bakar S, Syed Mohamed Shahruddin S, Ismail N, Adnan W PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13694.

PMID: 35935256 PMC: 9351620. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13694.


A Model for Estimating Biological Age From Physiological Biomarkers of Healthy Aging: Cross-sectional Study.

Husted K, Brink-Kjaer A, Fogelstrom M, Hulst P, Bleibach A, Henneberg K JMIR Aging. 2022; 5(2):e35696.

PMID: 35536617 PMC: 9131142. DOI: 10.2196/35696.


Diabetes mellitus correlates with increased biological age as indicated by clinical biomarkers.

Bahour N, Cortez B, Pan H, Shah H, Doria A, Aguayo-Mazzucato C Geroscience. 2021; 44(1):415-427.

PMID: 34773197 PMC: 8589453. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-021-00469-0.


References
1.
. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990; 16(3):199-208. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9. View

2.
Ingram D, Nakamura E, Smucny D, Roth G, Lane M . Strategy for identifying biomarkers of aging in long-lived species. Exp Gerontol. 2001; 36(7):1025-34. DOI: 10.1016/s0531-5565(01)00110-3. View

3.
Ueno L, Yamashita Y, Moritani T, Nakamura E . Biomarkers of aging in women and the rate of longitudinal changes. J Physiol Anthropol Appl Human Sci. 2003; 22(1):37-46. DOI: 10.2114/jpa.22.37. View

4.
. Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet. 2004; 363(9403):157-63. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15268-3. View

5.
Yin D, Chen K . The essential mechanisms of aging: Irreparable damage accumulation of biochemical side-reactions. Exp Gerontol. 2005; 40(6):455-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2005.03.012. View