» Articles » PMID: 30894577

Revealing Dissociable Attention Biases in Chronic Smokers Through an Individual-Differences Approach

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Mar 22
PMID 30894577
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Addiction is accompanied by attentional biases (AB), wherein drug-related cues grab attention independently of their perceptual salience. AB have emerged in different flavours depending on the experimental approach, and their clinical relevance is still debated. In chronic smokers we sought evidence for dissociable attention abnormalities that may play distinct roles in the clinical manifestations of the disorder. Fifty smokers performed a modified visual probe-task measuring two forms of AB and their temporal dynamics, and data on their personality traits and smoking history/status were collected. Two fully dissociable AB effects were found: A Global effect, reflecting the overall impact of smoke cues on attention, and a Location-specific effect, indexing the impact of smoke cues on visuospatial orienting. Importantly, the two effects could be neatly separated from one another as they: (i) unfolded with dissimilar temporal dynamics, (ii) were accounted for by different sets of predictors associated with personality traits and smoking history and (iii) were not correlated with one another. Importantly, the relevance of each of these two components in the single individual depends on a complex blend of personality traits and smoking habits, a result that future efforts addressing the clinical relevance of addiction-related AB should take into careful consideration.

Citing Articles

Pupil size as a robust marker of attentional bias toward nicotine-related stimuli in smokers.

Blini E, Zorzi M Psychon Bull Rev. 2022; 30(2):596-607.

PMID: 36229711 PMC: 9559544. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-022-02192-z.


Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced early attentional bias toward sexual images in individuals with tendencies toward cybersex addiction.

Wang J, Chen Y, Zhang H J Behav Addict. 2021; .

PMID: 34817398 PMC: 8987427. DOI: 10.1556/2006.2021.00082.

References
1.
Freeman T, Das R, Kamboj S, Curran H . Dopamine, urges to smoke, and the relative salience of drug versus non-drug reward. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 10(1):85-92. PMC: 4994847. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsu026. View

2.
Mogg K, Bradley B . Selective processing of smoking-related cues in smokers: manipulation of deprivation level and comparison of three measures of processing bias. J Psychopharmacol. 2002; 16(4):385-92. DOI: 10.1177/026988110201600416. View

3.
Field M, Werthmann J, Franken I, Hofmann W, Hogarth L, Roefs A . The role of attentional bias in obesity and addiction. Health Psychol. 2016; 35(8):767-80. DOI: 10.1037/hea0000405. View

4.
Hickey C, Peelen M . Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision. Neuron. 2015; 85(3):512-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.049. View

5.
Chelazzi L, Perlato A, Santandrea E, Della Libera C . Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Res. 2012; 85:58-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005. View