Behavioural Responses to Habitat Patch Boundaries Restrict Dispersal and Generate Emigration-patch Area Relationships in Fragmented Landscapes
Overview
Environmental Health
Authors
Affiliations
We studied the consequences of behaviour at habitat patch boundaries on dispersal for the bog fritillary butterfly Proclossiana eunomia Esper in two networks of habitat differing in fragmentation and matrix quality. We tested for differences in responses to patch boundaries according to the fragmentation level of the network by analysing movement paths of adult butterflies. Butterflies systematically engaged in U-turns when they reached a boundary in the fragmented network while they crossed over boundaries in more than 40% of boundary encounters in the continuous one. We applied the Virtual Migration model (Hanski, Alho & Moilanen 2000) to capture-mark-recapture data collected in both networks. The model indicated (i) a lower dispersal rate and (ii) a lower survival during dispersal in the fragmented network. This latter difference is likely to be the key biological process leading to behavioural avoidance of patch boundary crossings. On the basis of this behavioural difference, we designed an individual-based simulation model to explore the relationship between patch area, boundary permeability and emigration rate. Predictions of the model fitted observed results of the effect of patch area on emigration rate according to fragmentation: butterflies are more likely to leave small patches than large ones in fragmented landscapes (where patch boundary permeability is low), while this relationship disappears in more continuous landscapes (where patch boundary permeability is high).
Mancini A, Chandrashekar A, Lahitsara J, Ogbeta D, Rajaonarivelo J, Ranaivorazo N Genes (Basel). 2023; 14(3).
PMID: 36981017 PMC: 10048730. DOI: 10.3390/genes14030746.
Movements of a Specialist Butterfly in Relation to Mowing Management of Its Habitat Patches.
Popovic M, Nowicki P Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(3).
PMID: 36979036 PMC: 10045459. DOI: 10.3390/biology12030344.
Two simple movement mechanisms for spatial division of labour in social insects.
Richardson T, Stroeymeyt N, Crespi A, Keller L Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):6985.
PMID: 36379933 PMC: 9666475. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-34706-7.
Murphy M, Boone M Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(6):e9022.
PMID: 35784035 PMC: 9217892. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9022.
Early life experience influences dispersal in coyotes ().
Zepeda E, Payne E, Wurth A, Sih A, Gehrt S Behav Ecol. 2021; 32(4):728-737.
PMID: 34421364 PMC: 8374878. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arab027.