» Articles » PMID: 30890305

A Study of Contact Lens Compliance in a Non-clinical Setting

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2019 Mar 21
PMID 30890305
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate soft contact lens replacement, overnight (ON) wear, and contact lens case compliance in a non-clinical sample.

Methods: Subjects (n = 297) were recruited at the Center for Science and Industry (COSI) in Columbus, Ohio. Adult (≥ 18 years) soft contact lens wearers completed a survey about contact lens replacement, ON contact lens wear, and contact lens case replacement habits.

Results: Two-week replacement lenses (according to the manufacturer's replacement schedule [MRS]) were most common (45.5%), followed by monthly (34.3%) and daily replacement (20.2%). Non-compliance with replacement schedule was reported in 38.7% of subjects. Age (p = 0.02), years of lens wear (p = 0.02), and MRS (p <0.0001) affected replacement compliance. Post-hoc analysis showed daily replacement wearers were more compliant than two-week (p <0.0001) and monthly (p <0.0001) replacement wearers with prescribed lens replacement. Non-compliance with prescribed ON wear was reported in 23.9% of subjects. Subjects who were non-compliant with lens replacement were more likely to be non-compliant with ON wear (p = 0.02) and had worn contact lenses for less time (p = 0.02). Of the subjects who used contact lens cases, 74.6% were unsure when they should replace their case. Frequency of case replacement was not associated with age (p = 0.5), gender (p = 0.5), years of contact lens wear (p = 0.7), MRS (p = 0.4), replacement compliance (p = 0.3), or ON wear compliance (p = 0.7).

Conclusions: Daily replacement wearers were most likely to be compliant with contact lens replacement, but all subjects, including daily replacement wearers, had similar ON wear non-compliance. Non-compliant lens replacement was associated with non-compliant ON wear, but contact lens case replacement was not related to either compliance category. The majority of subjects had no knowledge of proper contact lens case replacement, despite compliance in other categories.

Citing Articles

How Can We Better Inform Patients of the Importance of Contact Lens Compliance?: Current Perspectives.

Fogt J, Roth M, Gardner H Clin Optom (Auckl). 2024; 16:267-286.

PMID: 39507399 PMC: 11539749. DOI: 10.2147/OPTO.S405204.


Risk Factors for Bacterial Keratitis and Severe Disease in Hydrogel Contact Lens Users: A Multicenter Case-Control Study and Case-Only Analysis.

Szczotka-Flynn L, Raghupathy S, Shah S, Suri K, Briggs F, Iyengar S Eye Contact Lens. 2024; 50(11):461-466.

PMID: 39252204 PMC: 11499010. DOI: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000001125.


EVALUATION OF WEAR EXPERIENCE WITH WATER SURFACE DAILY DISPOSABLE LENSES IN SATISFIED REUSABLE SOFT CONTACT LENS WEARERS.

Fogt J, Menner A, Patton K J Contact Lens Res Sci. 2023; 6(1):e18-e24.

PMID: 37724169 PMC: 10506162. DOI: 10.22374/jclrs.v6i1.53.


Compliance to contact lens wear and care among Jordanian adults.

Gammoh Y, Asfour W PLoS One. 2023; 18(1):e0280409.

PMID: 36630467 PMC: 9833521. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280409.


Compliance of Soft Contact Lens Care and Bacterial Contamination Among University Students in Palestine.

Beshtawi I, Qaddumi J, Suboh N, Zaid A, Mansour H, Zeyadeh T Clin Ophthalmol. 2022; 16:4121-4134.

PMID: 36536924 PMC: 9759000. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S352209.


References
1.
Harris P, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde J . Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2008; 42(2):377-81. PMC: 2700030. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. View

2.
Suchecki J, EHLERS W, Donshik P . A comparison of contact lens-related complications in various daily wear modalities. CLAO J. 2000; 26(4):204-13. View

3.
Schein O, McNally J, Katz J, Chalmers R, Tielsch J, Alfonso E . The incidence of microbial keratitis among wearers of a 30-day silicone hydrogel extended-wear contact lens. Ophthalmology. 2005; 112(12):2172-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.09.014. View

4.
Richdale K, Lam D, Wagner H, Zimmerman A, Kinoshita B, Chalmers R . Case-Control Pilot Study of Soft Contact Lens Wearers With Corneal Infiltrative Events and Healthy Controls. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016; 57(1):47-55. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.15-18512. View

5.
Nilsson S, Montan P . The annualized incidence of contact lens induced keratitis in Sweden and its relation to lens type and wear schedule: results of a 3-month prospective study. CLAO J. 1994; 20(4):225-30. DOI: 10.1097/00140068-199410000-00006. View