» Articles » PMID: 30890167

Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in Women Aged 35-50 years: Impact of Including Sex Hormone Concentrations in the Gail Model

Abstract

Background: Models that accurately predict risk of breast cancer are needed to help younger women make decisions about when to begin screening. Premenopausal concentrations of circulating anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a biomarker of ovarian reserve, and testosterone have been positively associated with breast cancer risk in prospective studies. We assessed whether adding AMH and/or testosterone to the Gail model improves its prediction performance for women aged 35-50.

Methods: In a nested case-control study including ten prospective cohorts (1762 invasive cases/1890 matched controls) with pre-diagnostic serum/plasma samples, we estimated relative risks (RR) for the biomarkers and Gail risk factors using conditional logistic regression and random-effects meta-analysis. Absolute risk models were developed using these RR estimates, attributable risk fractions calculated using the distributions of the risk factors in the cases from the consortium, and population-based incidence and mortality rates. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to compare the discriminatory accuracy of the models with and without biomarkers.

Results: The AUC for invasive breast cancer including only the Gail risk factor variables was 55.3 (95% CI 53.4, 57.1). The AUC increased moderately with the addition of AMH (AUC 57.6, 95% CI 55.7, 59.5), testosterone (AUC 56.2, 95% CI 54.4, 58.1), or both (AUC 58.1, 95% CI 56.2, 59.9). The largest AUC improvement (4.0) was among women without a family history of breast cancer.

Conclusions: AMH and testosterone moderately increase the discriminatory accuracy of the Gail model among women aged 35-50. We observed the largest AUC increase for women without a family history of breast cancer, the group that would benefit most from improved risk prediction because early screening is already recommended for women with a family history.

Citing Articles

Age‑integrated breast imaging reporting and data system assessment model to improve the accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis.

Deng J, Shi M, Wang M, Liao N, Jia Y, Lu W Mol Clin Oncol. 2024; 21(3):60.

PMID: 39071974 PMC: 11273246. DOI: 10.3892/mco.2024.2758.


DDIT3 is associated with breast cancer prognosis and immune microenvironment: an integrative bioinformatic and immunohistochemical analysis.

Yu X, Li W, Sun S, Li J J Cancer. 2024; 15(12):3873-3889.

PMID: 38911383 PMC: 11190778. DOI: 10.7150/jca.96491.


Addition of polygenic risk score to a risk calculator for prediction of breast cancer in US Black women.

Zirpoli G, Pfeiffer R, Bertrand K, Huo D, Lunetta K, Palmer J Breast Cancer Res. 2024; 26(1):2.

PMID: 38167144 PMC: 10763003. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-023-01748-8.


Prediabetes and the risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Lin J, Tu R, Lu Z Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1238845.

PMID: 37790752 PMC: 10544966. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238845.


Goodness-of-fit two-phase sampling designs for time-to-event outcomes: a simulation study based on New York University Women's Health Study for breast cancer.

Lee M, Chen J, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Liu M BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023; 23(1):119.

PMID: 37208600 PMC: 10199513. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-023-01950-4.


References
1.
Lukanova A, Lundin E, Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A, Muti P, MURE A, Rinaldi S . Body mass index, circulating levels of sex-steroid hormones, IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3: a cross-sectional study in healthy women. Eur J Endocrinol. 2004; 150(2):161-71. DOI: 10.1530/eje.0.1500161. View

2.
Klabunde C, Ballard-Barbash R . Evaluating Population-Based Screening Mammography Programs Internationally. Semin Breast Dis. 2008; 10(2):102-107. PMC: 2390929. DOI: 10.1053/j.sembd.2007.09.007. View

3.
Wacholder S, Hartge P, Prentice R, Garcia-Closas M, Feigelson H, Diver W . Performance of common genetic variants in breast-cancer risk models. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362(11):986-93. PMC: 2921181. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907727. View

4.
Pfeiffer R, Park Y, Kreimer A, Lacey Jr J, Pee D, Greenlee R . Risk prediction for breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer in white women aged 50 y or older: derivation and validation from population-based cohort studies. PLoS Med. 2013; 10(7):e1001492. PMC: 3728034. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001492. View

5.
Freedman A, Graubard B, Rao S, McCaskill-Stevens W, Ballard-Barbash R, Gail M . Estimates of the number of US women who could benefit from tamoxifen for breast cancer chemoprevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95(7):526-32. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/95.7.526. View