» Articles » PMID: 30887456

Prevalence of Distracted Walking with Mobile Technology: an Observational Study of Calgary and Edmonton High School Students

Overview
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Public Health
Date 2019 Mar 20
PMID 30887456
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Distracted walking poses a safety concern while crossing roads. A 2014 Canadian survey showed that 51% of teenagers were hit or almost hit while crossing the street, many of whom were distracted by mobile technology. An American study demonstrated that 1 in 5 high school students engaged in distracted walking; however, prevalence estimates in Canada have not been described. This study aimed to obtain a prevalence estimate of distracted walking in high school students in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Methods: Students were observed crossing the street at 20 high schools following afternoon school dismissal times during September to November 2017. Behaviours included talking on mobile phone, using earbuds, looking down at phone, and engaging in more than one of these behaviours. Also recorded were median household income of surrounding neighbourhood, outside temperature, gender, and crosswalk type.

Results: A total of 3553 students were observed, with 666 engaged in distracted walking (18.7%). Females engaged in distracted walking more than males (19.9% vs. 17.6%, respectively). The most prevalent behaviour was using earbuds (66.5%). Males had a lower prevalence of distracted walking compared with females. Distracted walking was more prevalent when the temperature was above 10 °C compared with less than 0 °C and less prevalent at signaled compared with non-signaled intersections.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that approximately 1 in 5 high school students in Calgary and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, engage in distracted walking behaviours while crossing the street. These results may help raise awareness and inform policy to decrease risk of pedestrian injury.

Citing Articles

Prevention of "bygone futures" due to road traffic injuries in children.

Kumar V, Barik S, Raj V, Varshney S Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2023; 50(6):2799-2805.

PMID: 37870567 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02378-7.

References
1.
Basch C, Ethan D, Rajan S, Basch C . Technology-related distracted walking behaviours in Manhattan's most dangerous intersections. Inj Prev. 2014; 20(5):343-6. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2013-041063. View

2.
Zou G . A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 159(7):702-6. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwh090. View

3.
Lichenstein R, Smith D, Ambrose J, Moody L . Headphone use and pedestrian injury and death in the United States: 2004-2011. Inj Prev. 2012; 18(5):287-90. DOI: 10.1136/injuryprev-2011-040161. View

4.
Stavrinos D, Byington K, Schwebel D . Effect of cell phone distraction on pediatric pedestrian injury risk. Pediatrics. 2009; 123(2):e179-85. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-1382. View

5.
Yannis G, Laiou A, Papantoniou P, Christoforou C . Impact of texting on young drivers' behavior and safety on urban and rural roads through a simulation experiment. J Safety Res. 2014; 49:25-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.008. View