» Articles » PMID: 30887106

Human Altered Disturbance Patterns and Forest Succession: Impacts of Competition and Ungulate Herbivory

Overview
Journal Oecologia
Date 2019 Mar 20
PMID 30887106
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human activities are altering patterns of ungulate herbivory and wildfire regimes globally with large potential impacts on plant community succession and ecosystem resilience. Aspen (Populus tremuloides) is a keystone species which co-exists with conifer species across temperate forests in North America. Aspen sucker regeneration which is the foundation of aspen-conifer forests succession is often a targeted food source by multiple ungulate species. Using a region-wide exclosure network across a broad gradient of aspen-conifer overstory abundance, we empirically tested the effects of ungulate herbivory and conifer competition (that increases with fire suppression), on the regeneration and recruitment of aspen forests over a 4-year period. The study results indicate that ungulate herbivory and increasing abundance of overstory conifers dramatically reduced aspen regeneration and recruitment success. The average height of aspen suckers exposed to ungulate herbivory was 72% shorter than aspen suckers in fenced plots and resulted in 24% less recruitment. There was a 9% decrease in aspen recruitment and 12% decrease in average aspen height with every 20% increase in overstory conifer density. Aspen suckers were most vulnerable to herbivory at 70 cm height, with the probability of herbivory decreasing under 50 cm or above 90 cm. Steep slope angles and higher winter precipitation increased aspen regeneration and recruitment success. Reduction in aspen recruitment in response to ungulate herbivory and competition by conifers may result in loss of biodiversity, altered forest function and loss of key ecosystem services because of the important role that aspen plays in facilitating forest succession and biodiversity.

Citing Articles

Sampling bias exaggerates a textbook example of a trophic cascade.

Brice E, Larsen E, MacNulty D Ecol Lett. 2021; 25(1):177-188.

PMID: 34748261 PMC: 9298920. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13915.


Continent-wide synthesis of the long-term population dynamics of quaking aspen in the face of accelerating human impacts.

Refsland T, Cushman J Oecologia. 2021; 197(1):25-42.

PMID: 34365517 DOI: 10.1007/s00442-021-05013-7.


76-year decline and recovery of aspen mediated by contrasting fire regimes: Long-unburned, infrequent and frequent mixed-severity wildfire.

Brewen C, Berrill J, Ritchie M, Boston K, Dagley C, Jones B PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0232995.

PMID: 33539349 PMC: 7861421. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232995.

References
1.
Bowman D, Balch J, Artaxo P, Bond W, Carlson J, Cochrane M . Fire in the Earth system. Science. 2009; 324(5926):481-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1163886. View

2.
Harding S, Jarvie M, Lindroth R, Tsai C . A comparative analysis of phenylpropanoid metabolism, N utilization, and carbon partitioning in fast- and slow-growing Populus hybrid clones. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60(12):3443-52. PMC: 2724693. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp180. View

3.
Kauffman M, Brodie J, Jules E . Are wolves saving Yellowstone's aspen? A landscape-level test of a behaviorally mediated trophic cascade. Ecology. 2010; 91(9):2742-55. DOI: 10.1890/09-1949.1. View

4.
Turner M . Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology. 2010; 91(10):2833-49. DOI: 10.1890/10-0097.1. View

5.
Calder W, Horn K, St Clair S . Conifer expansion reduces the competitive ability and herbivore defense of aspen by modifying light environment and soil chemistry. Tree Physiol. 2011; 31(6):582-91. DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpr041. View