» Articles » PMID: 30882873

Social Abilities and Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking Skill: Deaf Signers and Hearing Nonsigners

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 19
PMID 30882873
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Social abilities relate to performance on visual-spatial perspective-taking (VSPT) tasks for hearing nonsigners but may relate differently to VSPT abilities for deaf signers because of their distinct linguistic and social experiences. This research investigated whether deaf adults approach VSPT tasks nonsocially (as previously suggested for deaf children) or socially (as seen for hearing adults). Adult hearing nonsigners (n = 45) and deaf signers (n = 44) performed a nonlinguistic VSPT task, mental rotation and spatial orientation tasks, and completed a questionnaire measuring social abilities and degree of socialness. No group differences were observed for any of the spatial tasks. Hearing nonsigners with better social abilities performed better on the VSPT task but deaf signers who were less social performed better on the VSPT task. Therefore, social abilities and VSPT skill relate differently for deaf and hearing individuals, possibly due to differences in communication modality and/or sociocultural experiences.

Citing Articles

Navigation strategies in patients with vestibular loss tested in a virtual reality T-maze.

Gammeri R, Leonard J, Toupet M, Hautefort C, Van Nechel C, Besnard S J Neurol. 2022; 269(8):4333-4348.

PMID: 35306619 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11069-z.


Spatial perspective-taking: insights from sensory impairments.

Job X, Kirsch L, Auvray M Exp Brain Res. 2021; 240(1):27-37.

PMID: 34716457 PMC: 8803716. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-021-06221-6.


Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking in Spatial Scenes and in American Sign Language.

Secora K, Emmorey K J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020; 25(4):447-456.

PMID: 32476020 PMC: 7673616. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enaa006.


Unilateral vestibular deafferentation impairs embodied spatial cognition.

Deroualle D, Borel L, Tanguy B, Bernard-Demanze L, Deveze A, Montava M J Neurol. 2019; 266(Suppl 1):149-159.

PMID: 31230115 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-019-09433-7.

References
1.
Swineford L, Thurm A, Baird G, Wetherby A, Swedo S . Social (pragmatic) communication disorder: a research review of this new DSM-5 diagnostic category. J Neurodev Disord. 2014; 6(1):41. PMC: 4258293. DOI: 10.1186/1866-1955-6-41. View

2.
Ruzich E, Allison C, Smith P, Watson P, Auyeung B, Ring H . Measuring autistic traits in the general population: a systematic review of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ) in a nonclinical population sample of 6,900 typical adult males and females. Mol Autism. 2015; 6:2. PMC: 4396128. DOI: 10.1186/2040-2392-6-2. View

3.
Marschark M, Spencer L, Durkin A, Borgna G, Convertino C, Machmer E . Understanding Language, Hearing Status, and Visual-Spatial Skills. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015; 20(4):310-30. PMC: 4836709. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/env025. View

4.
Kessler K, Rutherford H . The Two Forms of Visuo-Spatial Perspective Taking are Differently Embodied and Subserve Different Spatial Prepositions. Front Psychol. 2011; 1:213. PMC: 3153818. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2010.00213. View

5.
Peters M . Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems. Brain Cogn. 2005; 57(2):176-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.052. View