» Articles » PMID: 3088190

The Computerized Severity Index. A New Tool for Case-mix Management

Overview
Journal J Med Syst
Date 1986 Feb 1
PMID 3088190
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We describe the new Computerized Severity Index (CSI) that is obtained from an expanded discharge abstract data set, based on a 6th-digit severity addition to the ICD-9-CM coding system. The new 6-digit code book (called ICD-9-CMSA) is used to label existence and severity of each principal and secondary diagnosis. It can be used to produce an overall severity of illness level for each hospital inpatient. The impact of severity-adjusted DRGs on prospective payment and uses of the CSI for assessing quality of care, efficiency, physician practice profiles, and prediction of posthospital resource needs are discussed.

Citing Articles

Procedure codes: potential modifiers of diagnosis-related groups.

HUGHES J, Lichtenstein J, FETTER R Health Care Financ Rev. 1991; 12(1):39-46.

PMID: 10113461 PMC: 4193095.


Continuous assessment and improvement in quality of care. A model from the Department of Veterans Affairs Cardiac Surgery.

Hammermeister K, Johnson R, Marshall G, Grover F Ann Surg. 1994; 219(3):281-90.

PMID: 8147609 PMC: 1243136. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199403000-00008.


Case-mix adjustment using objective measures of severity: the case for laboratory data.

Mozes B, Easterling M, Sheiner L, Melmon K, Kline R, Goldman E Health Serv Res. 1994; 28(6):689-712.

PMID: 8113053 PMC: 1069976.


Product definition for healthcare contracting: an overview of approaches to measuring hospital output with reference to the UK internal market.

Soderlund N J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994; 48(3):224-31.

PMID: 8051519 PMC: 1059951. DOI: 10.1136/jech.48.3.224.


The role of medical informatics in telemedicine.

Clemmer T J Med Syst. 1995; 19(1):47-58.

PMID: 7790807 DOI: 10.1007/BF02257190.


References
1.
Horn S, BULKLEY G, Sharkey P, Chambers A, Horn R, Schramm C . Interhospital differences in severity of illness. Problems for prospective payment based on diagnosis-related groups (DRGs). N Engl J Med. 1985; 313(1):20-4. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198507043130105. View

2.
Jencks S, Goldman H, McGuire T . Challenges in bringing exempt psychiatric services under a prospective payment system. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1985; 36(7):764-9. DOI: 10.1176/ps.36.7.764. View

3.
Coffey R, GOLDFARB M . DRGs and disease staging for reimbursing Medicare patients. Med Care. 1986; 24(9):814-29. DOI: 10.1097/00005650-198609000-00003. View

4.
Horn S, Horn R, Sharkey P . The Severity of Illness Index as a severity adjustment to diagnosis-related groups. Health Care Financ Rev. 1983; Suppl:33-45. PMC: 4195109. View

5.
Horn S, Horn R, MOSES H . Profiles of physician practice and patient severity of illness. Am J Public Health. 1986; 76(5):532-5. PMC: 1646608. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.76.5.532. View