» Articles » PMID: 30881773

Predictors of Oral Function and Facial Aesthetics Post Maxillofacial Reconstruction with Free Fibula Flap

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2019 Mar 19
PMID 30881773
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: For maxillofacial reconstruction, free flaps have largely replaced pedicled flaps. In a Saudi Arabian sample, we (1) assessed patients' postoperative oral function and facial aesthetics (OFFA), specifically pertaining to diet, speech intelligibility, oral opening, maxilla-mandibular occlusion, and facial aesthetics (all rated 0-2) following fibular free flap surgery; and (2) identified preoperative predictors of a novel 10-point OFFA rating scale combining these 5 parameters.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of all patients who underwent free fibula flap surgery for nontraumatic maxillofacial reconstruction from 2010 to 2017 and were followed postoperatively for at least 6 months or until death.

Results: In 20 patients (10 female; mean age, 33.8; range, 7-56), the results were excellent, 19 of 20 patients ultimately resuming a normal diet, one a soft diet; good oral opening in 18; and normal speech, normal occlusion, and an aesthetically good result, each in 17 patients. Half the patients had a perfect (10/10) OFFA score at final assessment, whereas 2 scored 9/10, one 8/10, and two 6/10. On univariate analysis, patient age > 45, tumor of higher malignancy potential, comorbid illness, and adjuvant radiotherapy predicted a worse OFFA score, whereas a multivariate model combining comorbid illness ( = 0.002) and preoperative radiotherapy ( = 0.010) predicted a lower OFFA score, accounting for 57% of the variance (R = 0.57).

Conclusion: In Saudi Arabia, fibular free flaps yielded overall very good to excellent results in 19 of 20 patients undergoing nontraumatic maxillofacial reconstruction.

Citing Articles

Role of residual mandibular teeth after computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction using a fibular flap.

Kurosawa K, Ohkoshi A, Ishii R, Sato N, Miyashita H, Harata T JPRAS Open. 2024; 42:350-360.

PMID: 39583297 PMC: 11582545. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.002.


Double free flaps for complex oromandibular defects with two teams of head and neck reconstructive surgical oncologists.

Nguyen K J Surg Case Rep. 2023; 2023(6):rjad394.

PMID: 37397071 PMC: 10308916. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjad394.


Thirty-eight-year follow-up of the first patient of mandibular reconstruction with free vascularized fibula flap.

Puricelli E, Chem R Head Face Med. 2021; 17(1):46.

PMID: 34711252 PMC: 8554960. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-021-00293-z.

References
1.
Blackwell K . Unsurpassed reliability of free flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125(3):295-9. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.3.295. View

2.
Cordeiro P, Disa J, Hidalgo D, Hu Q . Reconstruction of the mandible with osseous free flaps: a 10-year experience with 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999; 104(5):1314-20. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199910000-00011. View

3.
Weaver D . Free skin grafts and pedicle flaps in the repair of nasal defects. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1958; 62(1):84-9. View

4.
Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E, Vallicioni J, Demard F, Santini J . Head and neck reconstruction with free flaps: a report on 213 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 265(1):85-95. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-007-0410-1. View

5.
Bozec A, Poissonnet G, Chamorey E, Casanova C, Vallicioni J, Demard F . Free-flap head and neck reconstruction and quality of life: a 2-year prospective study. Laryngoscope. 2008; 118(5):874-80. DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e3181644abd. View