» Articles » PMID: 30881140

A Retrospective Study of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Lesions Diagnosed at the Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2019 Mar 19
PMID 30881140
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Oral and maxillofacial lesions (OMFL) comprise a broad spectrum of benign and malignant lesions that affect the oral cavity. However, few epidemiological studies have evaluated oral cavity lesions, and very few have focused on oral soft tissue pathology. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence and distribution of OMFL that had been diagnosed histologically at the Oral Pathology Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University.

Materials And Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to assess the distribution of OMFL among the oral cavity biopsies submitted to the Oral Pathology Laboratory during the period from 1996 to 2016. Information on sex, age, location of the lesion, and histopathologic diagnosis was analyzed.

Results: A total of 1,218 cases were examined. Among these, reactive/adaptive lesions were the most common type (n=245; 20.1%) and cystic lesions were the second most common (n=214; 17.6%), followed by inflammatory lesions (n=152; 12.5%) and epithelial pathology (n=115; 9.4%).

Conclusion: The results of the present study provide valuable information on the prevalence of OMFL in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Reactive conditions were the most frequently diagnosed pathologies. Most oral and maxillofacial biopsies were soft tissue lesions, benign in nature, and inflammatory in origin. Further studies are necessary to provide more information on head and neck diseases in the general population to develop better future oral health policies.

Citing Articles

An Assessment of the Distribution and Prevalence of Benign Intraoral Pathologies.

Ertem S, Uz F Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941280 PMC: 11816954. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030350.


Patterns of Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions in Eastern Uttar Pradesh Region: A Retrospective Study.

Agrawal R, Chandra A, Singh J, Khairnar M, Jain T, Raja D J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2025; 24(1):45-51.

PMID: 39902428 PMC: 11787072. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01736-z.


The Prevalence and Diagnostic Patterns of Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions: A Seven-Year, Retrospective, Single-Center Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Histopathology Study in Saudi Arabia.

Alzahrani S, Wazzan T, Almaghrabi A, Alkhudran A, Aljereb H, Elsayed S J Clin Med. 2025; 13(24.

PMID: 39768696 PMC: 11727750. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13247774.


Prevalence and Pattern of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology in Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia.

Alotaiby F, Alruhaimi R, Alzamil N, Alsemanni E, Almutairi A, Elsaka H Int J Dent. 2024; 2024:6611349.

PMID: 39355513 PMC: 11444797. DOI: 10.1155/2024/6611349.


Agreement Between Clinical and Histopathological Diagnoses of Oral and Maxillofacial Lesions and Influencing Factors: A Five-Year Retrospective Study.

Sindi A, Aljohani K Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2024; 16:273-282.

PMID: 39220270 PMC: 11366236. DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S473583.


References
1.
Franklin C, Jones A . A survey of oral and maxillofacial pathology specimens submitted by general dental practitioners over a 30-year period. Br Dent J. 2006; 200(8):447-50. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4813464. View

2.
Jones A, Franklin C . An analysis of oral and maxillofacial pathology found in adults over a 30-year period. J Oral Pathol Med. 2006; 35(7):392-401. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0714.2006.00451.x. View

3.
Mota-Ramirez A, Silvestre F, Simo J . Oral biopsy in dental practice. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007; 12(7):E504-10. View

4.
Mendez M, Carrard V, Haas A, Lauxen I, Barbachan J, Rados P . A 10-year study of specimens submitted to oral pathology laboratory analysis: lesion occurrence and demographic features. Braz Oral Res. 2012; 26(3):235-41. DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242012000300009. View

5.
Ali M, Sundaram D . Biopsied oral soft tissue lesions in Kuwait: a six-year retrospective analysis. Med Princ Pract. 2012; 21(6):569-75. DOI: 10.1159/000339121. View