» Articles » PMID: 30876411

Noninvasive High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilation As Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: a Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Journal Respir Res
Specialty Pulmonary Medicine
Date 2019 Mar 17
PMID 30876411
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (nHFOV), a relatively new modality, is gaining popularity despite scarce evidence. This meta-analysis was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nHFOV as respiratory support in premature infants.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception of the database to January 2019. All published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of nHFOV therapy with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or biphasic nCPAP (BP-CPAP) in newborns for respiratory support were included. All meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager 5.3.

Results: A total of 8 RCTs involving 463 patients were included. The meta-analysis estimated a lower risk of intubation (relative risk = 0.50, 95% confidence interval of 0.36 to 0.70) and more effective clearance of carbon dioxide (weighted mean difference = - 4.61, 95% confidence interval of - 7.94 to - 1.28) in the nHFOV group than in the nCPAP/BP-CPAP group.

Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of RCTs suggests that nHFOV, as respiratory support in preterm infants, significantly remove carbon dioxide and reduce the risk of intubation compared with nCPAP/BP-CPAP. The appropriate parameter settings for different types of noninvasive high-frequency ventilators, the effect of nHFOV in extremely preterm infants, and the long-term safety of nHFOV need to be assessed in large trials.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus non-invasive intermittent mandatory ventilation as a rescue mode in preterm infants with respiratory distress on nasal CPAP-a randomized control trial.

Rachana R, Oleti T, Saikiran D, Vardhelli V, Thiruveedi S, Hussain A Eur J Pediatr. 2025; 184(3):205.

PMID: 39985666 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-025-06041-8.


Noninvasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation as post- extubation respiratory support in neonates: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Prasad R, Saha B, Sk M, Sahoo J, Gupta B, Chandra Shaw S PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0307903.

PMID: 39078848 PMC: 11288463. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307903.


Nasal High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation Use in Romanian Neonatal Intensive Care Units-The Results of a Recent Survey.

Ognean M, Bivoleanu A, Cucerea M, Galis R, Rosca I, Surdu M Children (Basel). 2024; 11(7).

PMID: 39062285 PMC: 11276281. DOI: 10.3390/children11070836.


Non-invasive high-frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress.

Abdel-Latif M, Tan O, Fiander M, Osborn D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 5:CD012712.

PMID: 38695628 PMC: 11064768. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD012712.pub2.


Neonatal respiratory support strategies-short and long-term respiratory outcomes.

Kaltsogianni O, Dassios T, Greenough A Front Pediatr. 2023; 11:1212074.

PMID: 37565243 PMC: 10410156. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1212074.


References
1.
Kumar A, Bhat B . Epidemiology of respiratory distress of newborns. Indian J Pediatr. 1996; 63(1):93-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02823875. View

2.
Barrington K, Bull D, Finer N . Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001; 107(4):638-41. DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.4.638. View

3.
Pillow J, Wilkinson M, Neil H, Ramsden C . In vitro performance characteristics of high-frequency oscillatory ventilators. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001; 164(6):1019-24. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.6.2005008. View

4.
De Paoli A, Morley C, Davis P, Lau R, Hingeley E . In vitro comparison of nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices for neonates. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002; 87(1):F42-5. PMC: 1721427. DOI: 10.1136/fn.87.1.f42. View

5.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View