» Articles » PMID: 30874859

Differential Influence of Habitual Third-person Vision of a Body Part on Mental Rotation of Images of Hands and Feet

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Mar 16
PMID 30874859
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Left/right judgement (LRJ) tasks involve determining the laterality of presented hand or feet images. Allocentric images (third-person perspective; 3PP) take longer to identify than egocentric images (first-person perspective; 1PP), supporting that implicit motor imagery (IMI)-mentally manoeuvring one's body to match the shown posture-is used. While numerous cognitive processes are involved during LRJs, it remains unclear whether features of the individual (e.g., visual exposure, experience, task-dependent use) influence the type of recognition strategy used during LRJs (IMI versus non-IMI). To investigate whether an individual's routine visual exposure to hands/feet in 3PP disrupts the typical perspective-reaction time (RT) relationship in LRJs, hand therapists, podiatrists, and healthy controls completed online LRJ tasks of hand and feet images. A group-specific reduction in RT for only allocentric images would represent a switch to non-IMI strategies. The results show that routine visual exposure to feet in 3PP (podiatrists) results in quicker RTs only for allocentric images of feet, suggesting a switch from IMI to non-IMI (e.g., visual object-based recognition) strategies. In contrast, routine visual exposure to hands in 3PP (hand therapists) does not alter RT for allocentric images, suggesting maintenance of IMI. However, hand therapists have quicker RTs (vs other groups) for egocentric hand images, supporting enhanced sensorimotor processing for the hand, consistent with task-dependent use (precise hand use). Higher accuracy in health professionals (vs control) on both tasks supports enhanced body schema. Combined, this suggests that 3PP visual exposure to body parts and task-dependent use contribute to LRJ performance/recognition strategy.

Citing Articles

Degraded Visibility Body-Specifically Affects Mental Rotation.

Rotach Z, Beazley C, Ionta S Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39335999 PMC: 11429075. DOI: 10.3390/bs14090784.


Individual differences in processing ability to transform visual stimuli during the mental rotation task are closely related to individual motor adaptation ability.

Ito T, Kamiue M, Hosokawa T, Kimura D, Tsubahara A Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:941942.

PMID: 36452331 PMC: 9702079. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.941942.


Sex differences in the association of postural control with indirect measures of body representations.

Schulleri K, Johannsen L, Michel Y, Lee D Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4556.

PMID: 35296686 PMC: 8927351. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07738-8.


The effect of handedness on mental rotation of hands: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jones H, Braithwaite F, Edwards L, Causby R, Conson M, Stanton T Psychol Res. 2021; 85(8):2829-2881.

PMID: 33389042 DOI: 10.1007/s00426-020-01444-8.


Implicit motor imagery performance is impaired in people with chronic, but not acute, neck pain.

Wallwork S, Leake H, Peek A, Moseley G, Stanton T PeerJ. 2020; 8:e8553.

PMID: 32095368 PMC: 7025709. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8553.


References
1.
Jeannerod M . Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001; 14(1 Pt 2):S103-9. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2001.0832. View

2.
Cooper L, Shepard R . Mental transformations in the identification of left and right hands. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975; 104(1):48-56. View

3.
Sirigu A, Duhamel J . Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. J Cogn Neurosci. 2001; 13(7):910-9. DOI: 10.1162/089892901753165827. View

4.
Schwoebel J, Coslett H . Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J Cogn Neurosci. 2005; 17(4):543-53. DOI: 10.1162/0898929053467587. View

5.
Saxe R, Jamal N, Powell L . My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. Cereb Cortex. 2005; 16(2):178-82. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhi095. View