» Articles » PMID: 30874477

Predictors of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Infrequently Screened Women Completing Human Papillomavirus Self-Collection: My Body My Test-1

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 16
PMID 30874477
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Approximately one-half of cervical cancer cases in the United States occur in underscreened or never-screened women. We examined predictors to completing Papanicolaou (Pap) testing and whether a positive human papillomavirus (HPV) self-collection result affects Pap testing adherence among underscreened women. Low-income women aged 30-65 years who reported no Pap testing in ≥4 years were recruited in North Carolina. Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers regarding cervical cancer and Pap testing were assessed by telephone questionnaires. We mailed self-collection kits for HPV testing and provided information regarding where to obtain affordable Pap testing. Participants received $45 for completing all activities. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess the predictors of longer reported time since last Pap (≥10 vs. 4-9 years) and of completion of Pap testing following study enrollment (follow-up Pap). Participants ( = 230) were primarily black (55%), uninsured (64%), and with ≤high school education (59%). Cost and finding an affordable clinic were the most commonly reported barriers to screening. White women and those with ≤high school education reported longer intervals since last Pap test. Half of the participants reported completing a follow-up Pap test (55%). Women with a positive HPV self-collection were five times more likely to report completing a follow-up Pap test than those with negative self-collection (odds ratio = 5.1, 95% confidence interval 1.4-25.7). Improving awareness of resources for affordable screening could increase cervical cancer screening in underserved women. Home-based HPV self-collection represents an opportunity to re-engage infrequently screened women into preventive screening services.

Citing Articles

Factors affecting cervical cancer screening among Yemeni immigrant women in Klang Valley, Malaysia: A cross sectional study.

Al-Oseely S, Abdul Manaf R, Ismail S PLoS One. 2023; 18(12):e0290152.

PMID: 38100481 PMC: 10723656. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290152.


Social determinants of health and US cancer screening interventions: A systematic review.

Korn A, Walsh-Bailey C, Correa-Mendez M, DelNero P, Pilar M, Sandler B CA Cancer J Clin. 2023; 73(5):461-479.

PMID: 37329257 PMC: 10529377. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21801.


Effect of HPV self-collection kits on cervical cancer screening uptake among under-screened women from low-income US backgrounds (MBMT-3): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Pretsch P, Spees L, Brewer N, Hudgens M, Sanusi B, Rohner E Lancet Public Health. 2023; 8(6):e411-e421.

PMID: 37182529 PMC: 10283467. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00076-2.


Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening From Three U.S. Healthcare Settings.

Spencer J, Kim J, Tiro J, Feldman S, Kobrin S, Skinner C Am J Prev Med. 2023; 65(4):667-677.

PMID: 37146839 PMC: 11135625. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.04.016.


Prevention Strategies and Early Diagnosis of Cervical Cancer: Current State and Prospects.

Kakotkin V, Semina E, Zadorkina T, Agapov M Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832098 PMC: 9955852. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040610.


References
1.
Carmen M, Avila-Wallace M . Effect of health care disparities on screening. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 56(1):65-75. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31827af75a. View

2.
Ackerson K, Gretebeck K . Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2007; 19(11):591-601. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2007.00268.x. View

3.
Benard V, Royalty J, Saraiya M, Rockwell T, Helsel W . The effectiveness of targeting never or rarely screened women in a national cervical cancer screening program for underserved women. Cancer Causes Control. 2015; 26(5):713-9. PMC: 4488897. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-015-0542-3. View

4.
Vanderpool R, Jones M, Stradtman L, Smith J, Crosby R . Self-collecting a cervico-vaginal specimen for cervical cancer screening: an exploratory study of acceptability among medically underserved women in rural Appalachia. Gynecol Oncol. 2013; 132 Suppl 1:S21-5. PMC: 4753797. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.10.008. View

5.
Darlin L, Borgfeldt C, Forslund O, Henic E, Hortlund M, Dillner J . Comparison of use of vaginal HPV self-sampling and offering flexible appointments as strategies to reach long-term non-attending women in organized cervical screening. J Clin Virol. 2013; 58(1):155-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.029. View