» Articles » PMID: 30871977

Etoposide + Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor and Optional Plerixafor in Patients Who Failed Chemomobilization with or Without Plerixafor

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 16
PMID 30871977
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We conducted a retrospective study of 62 patients undergoing etoposide (2 g/m) + granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; 10 patients also received additional plerixafor) as a salvage stem cell mobilization regimen after previous unsuccessful chemomobilization with or without plerixafor. The median peak CD34 values after etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor was 54.07 CD34/μL compared with 9.6 CD34/μL after previous mobilization attempts (P < .001). The median yield was 6.33 × 10 CD34 cells/kg per 2 apheresis. Etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor mobilization regimen resulted in 91.53% successful mobilizations and 89.83% of patients proceeding to autologous stem cell transplantation. All 7 patients who had previously failed plerixafor-based mobilization attempts were successfully mobilized with etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor and proceeded to autologous stem cell transplantation. The most common grades 3 to 4 adverse events of etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor were febrile neutropenia (69.35%), mucositis (51.62%), and bacteremia (20.97%). No fatal outcomes were observed. Rates of 12-month overall survival and progression-free survival were 88.71% and 70.97%, respectively. Etoposide + G-CSF ± plerixafor is an effective regimen for salvage stem cell mobilization also in patients who failed plerixafor, with most patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation. The adverse event rate may warrant a decrease in the dose of etoposide.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with etoposide +cytarabine plus G-CSF in poor mobilizers with relapsed or refractory lymphoma.

Zhu Z, Li X, Yuan X, Chen X, Lin T, Guo X Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1439253.

PMID: 39091501 PMC: 11291192. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1439253.