» Articles » PMID: 30866885

Visual Implications of Digital Device Usage in School Children: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal BMC Ophthalmol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2019 Mar 15
PMID 30866885
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the use of digital devices, reading habits and the prevalence of eyestrain among urban Indian school children, aged 11-17 years.

Methods: The study included 576 adolescents attending urban schools who were surveyed regarding their electronic device usage. Additional information on the factors that may have an effect on ocular symptoms was collected.

Results: Twenty percent of students aged 11 in the study population use digital devices on a daily basis, in comparison with 50% of students aged 17. In addition to using these devices as homework aids, one third of study participants reported using digital devices for reading instead of conventional textbooks. The majority of students preferred sitting on a chair while reading (77%; 445 students), with only 21% (123 students) preferring to lie on the bed and 8 students alternating between chair and bed. There was a significant association between the students who preferred to lie down and those who experienced eyestrain, as reported by a little over one fourth of the student population (27%). Out of 576 students, 18% (103) experienced eyestrain at the end of the day after working on digital devices.

Conclusions: The increased use of digital devices by adolescents brings a new challenge of digital eyestrain at an early age. Our study reports the patterns of electronic device usage by school children, evaluates factors associated with eyestrain and highlights the need for further investigation of these issues.

Citing Articles

Assessment of digital eye strain and its associated factors among school children in Palestine.

Almahmoud O, Mahmmod K, Mohtaseb S, Totah N, Nijem D, Hammoudeh A BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):81.

PMID: 39972437 PMC: 11837294. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-03919-x.


Digital media use and its effects on digital eye strain and sleep quality in adolescents: A new emerging epidemic?.

Sambel Aykutlu M, Aykutlu H, Ozveren M, Garip R PLoS One. 2024; 19(12):e0314390.

PMID: 39700093 PMC: 11658585. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314390.


Smartphone use patterns and the impact on accommodation and convergence system of the eyes among Malaysian teenagers.

Chellapan T, Mat Daud N, Narayanasamy S Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(11):2093-2099.

PMID: 39559302 PMC: 11528288. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.11.16.


CVS-Q teen: an adapted, reliable and validated tool to assess computer vision syndrome in adolescents.

Segui-Crespo M, Canto-Sancho N, Sanchez-Brau M, Ronda-Perez E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21576.

PMID: 39285189 PMC: 11405871. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-70821-9.


Association of digital device usage and dry eye disease in school children.

Jadeja J, Shroff K, Shah A, Pandey A, Dubey S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2024; 72(7):1031-1036.

PMID: 38905463 PMC: 11329823. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_703_23.


References
1.
Burke A, Peper E . Cumulative trauma disorder risk for children using computer products: results of a pilot investigation with a student convenience sample. Public Health Rep. 2002; 117(4):350-7. PMC: 1497444. DOI: 10.1093/phr/117.4.350. View

2.
Izquierdo J, Garcia M, Buxo C, Izquierdo N . Factors leading to the Computer Vision Syndrome: an issue at the contemporary workplace. Bol Asoc Med P R. 2004; 96(2):103-10. View

3.
Sterner B, Gellerstedt M, Sjostrom A . Accommodation and the relationship to subjective symptoms with near work for young school children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2006; 26(2):148-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2006.00364.x. View

4.
Ip J, Robaei D, Rochtchina E, Mitchell P . Prevalence of eye disorders in young children with eyestrain complaints. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006; 142(3):495-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.03.047. View

5.
Bali J, Navin N, Thakur B . Computer vision syndrome: a study of the knowledge, attitudes and practices in Indian ophthalmologists. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2007; 55(4):289-94. DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.33042. View