» Articles » PMID: 30862623

Use of F2 Bulks in Training Sets for Genomic Prediction of Combining Ability and Hybrid Performance

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2019 Mar 14
PMID 30862623
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Developing training sets for genomic prediction in hybrid crops requires producing hybrid seed for a large number of entries. In autogamous crop species (, wheat, rice, rapeseed, cotton) this requires elaborate hybridization systems to prevent self-pollination and presents a significant impediment to the implementation of hybrid breeding in general and genomic selection in particular. An alternative to F1 hybrids are bulks of F2 seed from selfed F1 plants (F1:2). Seed production for F1:2 bulks requires no hybridization system because the number of F1 plants needed for producing enough F1:2 seed for multi-environment testing can be generated by hand-pollination. This study evaluated the suitability of F1:2 bulks for use in training sets for genomic prediction of F1 level general combining ability and hybrid performance, under different degrees of divergence between heterotic groups and modes of gene action, using quantitative genetic theory and simulation of a genomic prediction experiment. The simulation, backed by theory, showed that F1:2 training sets are expected to have a lower prediction accuracy relative to F1 training sets, particularly when heterotic groups have strongly diverged. The accuracy penalty, however, was only modest and mostly because of a lower heritability, rather than because of a difference in F1 and F1:2 genetic values. It is concluded that resorting to F1:2 bulks is, in theory at least, a promising approach to remove the significant complication of a hybridization system from the breeding process.

Citing Articles

Combining ability and gene action for fruit yield components, quality, shelf life and reaction to tomato leaf curl virus disease.

Manjunath K, Das S, Mallick R, Hazra P, Chattopadhyay A, Maji A Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e42040.

PMID: 39968155 PMC: 11834039. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42040.


Maternal effects, reciprocal differences and combining ability study for yield and its component traits in maize ( L.) through modified diallel analysis.

Antony John B, Kachapur R, Naidu G, Talekar S, Rashid Z, Vivek B PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17600.

PMID: 38948201 PMC: 11212646. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17600.


Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.

Labroo M, Studer A, Rutkoski J Front Genet. 2021; 12:643761.

PMID: 33719351 PMC: 7943638. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.643761.


Large-Scale Analysis of Combining Ability and Heterosis for Development of Hybrid Maize Breeding Strategies Using Diverse Germplasm Resources.

Yu K, Wang H, Liu X, Xu C, Li Z, Xu X Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11:660.

PMID: 32547580 PMC: 7278714. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00660.


Training Population Optimization for Genomic Selection in .

Olatoye M, Clark L, Labonte N, Dong H, Dwiyanti M, Anzoua K G3 (Bethesda). 2020; 10(7):2465-2476.

PMID: 32457095 PMC: 7341128. DOI: 10.1534/g3.120.401402.

References
1.
Stuber C, Cockerham C . Gene effects and variances in hybrid populations. Genetics. 1966; 54(6):1279-86. PMC: 1211293. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/54.6.1279. View

2.
Technow F, Gerke J . Parent-progeny imputation from pooled samples for cost-efficient genotyping in plant breeding. PLoS One. 2017; 12(12):e0190271. PMC: 5741258. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190271. View

3.
Habier D, Fernando R, Garrick D . Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics. 2013; 194(3):597-607. PMC: 3697966. DOI: 10.1534/genetics.113.152207. View

4.
Technow F, Riedelsheimer C, Schrag T, Melchinger A . Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects. Theor Appl Genet. 2012; 125(6):1181-94. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-1905-8. View

5.
Huang X, Yang S, Gong J, Zhao Y, Feng Q, Gong H . Genomic analysis of hybrid rice varieties reveals numerous superior alleles that contribute to heterosis. Nat Commun. 2015; 6:6258. PMC: 4327311. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms7258. View