» Articles » PMID: 30858236

Assessment of Genetic Differentiation and Linkage Disequilibrium in Using Genome-Wide High-Density SNP Markers

Overview
Journal G3 (Bethesda)
Date 2019 Mar 13
PMID 30858236
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To mine new favorable alleles for tomato breeding, we investigated the feasibility of utilizing as a diverse panel of genome-wide association study through the restriction site-associated DNA sequencing technique. Previous attempts to conduct genome-wide association studies using were impeded by an inability to correct for population stratification and by lack of high-density markers to address the issue of rapid linkage disequilibrium decay. In the current study, a set of 24,330 SNPs was identified using 99 accessions from the Tomato Genetic Resource Center. Approximately 84% of I site-associated DNA sequencing regions were located in the euchromatic regions, resulting in the tagging of most SNPs on or near genes. Our genotypic data suggested that were divided into three single-ancestry subpopulations and four mixed-ancestry subpopulations. Additionally, our SNP genotypic data consistently confirmed the genetic differentiation, achieving a relatively reliable correction of population stratification. Previous studies utilized the 8K tomato SNP array, SolCAP, to investigate the genetic variation of and we performed a meta-analysis of these genotypes. The result suggested SolCAP array was less appropriate to profile the genetic differentiation of when more accessions were involved because the samples belonging to the same accession demonstrated different genome patterns. Moreover, as expected, rapid linkage disequilibrium decay was observed in , especially in euchromatic regions. Approximately two-thirds of the flanking SNP markers did not display linkage disequilibrium based on = 0.1. However, the 18-Kb linkage disequilibrium decay indeed reveals the potential of single-gene resolution in GWAS when markers are saturated.

Citing Articles

The Genetic Basis of Tomato Aroma.

Martina M, Tikunov Y, Portis E, Bovy A Genes (Basel). 2021; 12(2).

PMID: 33557308 PMC: 7915847. DOI: 10.3390/genes12020226.


De novo genome assembly of two tomato ancestors, Solanum pimpinellifolium and Solanum  lycopersicum var. cerasiforme, by long-read sequencing.

Takei H, Shirasawa K, Kuwabara K, Toyoda A, Matsuzawa Y, Iioka S DNA Res. 2021; 28(1).

PMID: 33475141 PMC: 7934570. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsaa029.


The climatic association of population divergence and future extinction risk of .

Lin Y, Lu C, Lee C AoB Plants. 2020; 12(2):plaa012.

PMID: 32257092 PMC: 7107907. DOI: 10.1093/aobpla/plaa012.


Applications and Trends of Machine Learning in Genomics and Phenomics for Next-Generation Breeding.

Esposito S, Carputo D, Cardi T, Tripodi P Plants (Basel). 2019; 9(1).

PMID: 31881663 PMC: 7020215. DOI: 10.3390/plants9010034.

References
1.
Chen A, Liu C, Chen C, Wang J, Liao Y, Chang C . Reassessment of QTLs for late blight resistance in the tomato accession L3708 using a restriction site associated DNA (RAD) linkage map and highly aggressive isolates of Phytophthora infestans. PLoS One. 2014; 9(5):e96417. PMC: 4008630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096417. View

2.
Moyle L . Ecological and evolutionary genomics in the wild tomatoes (Solanum sect. Lycopersicon). Evolution. 2008; 62(12):2995-3013. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00487.x. View

3.
Shirasawa K, Hirakawa H, Isobe S . Analytical workflow of double-digest restriction site-associated DNA sequencing based on empirical and in silico optimization in tomato. DNA Res. 2016; 23(2):145-53. PMC: 4833422. DOI: 10.1093/dnares/dsw004. View

4.
Ranc N, Munos S, Xu J, Le Paslier M, Chauveau A, Bounon R . Genome-wide association mapping in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is possible using genome admixture of Solanum lycopersicum var. cerasiforme. G3 (Bethesda). 2012; 2(8):853-64. PMC: 3411241. DOI: 10.1534/g3.112.002667. View

5.
Bradbury P, Zhang Z, Kroon D, Casstevens T, Ramdoss Y, Buckler E . TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007; 23(19):2633-5. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308. View