» Articles » PMID: 30856193

On the Relative Importance of Space and Environment in Farmland Bird Community Assembly

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Mar 12
PMID 30856193
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The relative contribution of ecological processes in shaping metacommunity dynamics in heavily managed landscapes is still unclear. Here we used two complementary approaches to disentangle the role of environment and spatial effect in farmland bird community assembly in an intensive agro-ecosystem. We hypothesized that the interaction between habitat patches and dispersal should play a major role in such unstable and unpredictable environments. First, we used a metacommunity patterns analysis to characterize species co-occurrences and identify the main drivers of community assembly; secondly, variation partitioning was used to disentangle environmental and geographical factors (such as dispersal limitation) on community structure and composition. We used high spatial resolution data on bird community structure and composition distributed among 260 plots in an agricultural landscape. Species were partitioned into functional classes, and point count stations were classified according to landscape characteristics before applying metacommunity and partitioning analyses within each. Overall we could explain around 20% of the variance in species composition in our system, revealing that stochasticity remains very important at this scale. However, this proportion varies depending on the scale of analysis, and reveals potentially important contributions of environmental filtering and dispersal. These conclusions are further reinforced when the analysis was deconstructed by bird functional classes or by landscape habitat classes, underlining trait-related filters, thus reinforcing the idea that wooded areas in these agroecosystems may represent important sources for a specific group of bird species. Our analysis shows that deconstructing the species assemblages into separate functional groups and types of landscapes, along with a combination of analysis strategies, can help in understanding the mechanisms driving community assembly.

Citing Articles

Drivers of the taxonomic and functional structuring of aquatic and terrestrial floodplain bird communities.

Onodi G, Czegledi I, Eros T Landsc Ecol. 2024; 39(9):174.

PMID: 39247152 PMC: 11374819. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-024-01948-3.


Taxonomic and functional components of avian metacommunity structure along an urban gradient.

Stukenholtz E, Stevens R PLoS One. 2022; 17(8):e0271405.

PMID: 35944024 PMC: 9362948. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271405.


Phylogenetic diversity and community assembly in a naturally fragmented system.

Peterson K, Ruffley M, Parent C Ecol Evol. 2022; 11(24):18066-18080.

PMID: 35003658 PMC: 8717291. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8404.

References
1.
Janzen T, Alzate A, Muschick M, Maan M, van der Plas F, Etienne R . Community assembly in Lake Tanganyika cichlid fish: quantifying the contributions of both niche-based and neutral processes. Ecol Evol. 2017; 7(4):1057-1067. PMC: 5306054. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2689. View

2.
Peres-Neto P, Legendre P, Dray S, Borcard D . Variation partitioning of species data matrices: estimation and comparison of fractions. Ecology. 2006; 87(10):2614-25. DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[2614:vposdm]2.0.co;2. View

3.
Legendre P, Borcard D, Peres-Neto P . ANALYZING OR EXPLAINING BETA DIVERSITY? COMMENT. Ecology. 2019; 89(11):3238-3244. DOI: 10.1890/07-0272.1. View

4.
Legendre P, Gallagher E . Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia. 2017; 129(2):271-280. DOI: 10.1007/s004420100716. View

5.
Cottenie K . Integrating environmental and spatial processes in ecological community dynamics. Ecol Lett. 2011; 8(11):1175-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00820.x. View