» Articles » PMID: 30855157

Concept Mapping Study of Stakeholder Perceptions of Implementation of Cognitive-behavioral Social Skills Training on Assertive Community Treatment Teams

Overview
Journal Psychol Serv
Date 2019 Mar 12
PMID 30855157
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to identify factors associated with implementation of cognitive behavioral social skills training (CBSST) on assertive community treatment (ACT) teams in a large public sector behavioral health system. This study used concept mapping (a mixed-method approach) and involved a sample including diverse stakeholder participants including patients, ACT team members, team leaders, organization leaders, and system leaders. We identified 14 distinct issues related to implementing CBSST on ACT teams: (a) CBSST fit with ACT structure, (b) CBSST fit with ACT process, (c) provider perceptions about CBSST, (d) staff pressures/other demands; (e) CBSST and ACT synergy, (f) client characteristics, (g) benefits of CBSST, (h) coordination/interaction among ACT providers, (i) government/regulatory factors, (j) integration of CBSST into ACT, (k) training support, (l) training resources, (m) multilevel agency leadership, and (n) provider characteristics. Each of these dimensions were rated in regard to importance and changeability with the top 5 rated dimensions including effective training support; alignment of leadership across levels of the community-based organizations delivering services; perceived benefits of CBSST, CBSST and ACT synergy; and provider perceptions of CBSST. The most critical issues for CBSST implementation on ACT teams should be addressed in future studies. Implementation strategies that capitalize on enhancing leadership and organizational climate hold promise to address all of these issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Citing Articles

Use of concept mapping to inform a participatory engagement approach for implementation of evidence-based HPV vaccination strategies in safety-net clinics.

Tsui J, Shin M, Sloan K, Mackie T, Garcia S, Fehrenbacher A Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):71.

PMID: 38926886 PMC: 11210134. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00607-7.


The relationship between first-level leadership and inner-context and implementation outcomes in behavioral health: a scoping review.

Meza R, Triplett N, Woodard G, Martin P, Khairuzzaman A, Jamora G Implement Sci. 2021; 16(1):69.

PMID: 34229706 PMC: 8259113. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-021-01104-4.

References
1.
Willging C, Aarons G, Trott E, Green A, Finn N, Ehrhart M . Contracting and Procurement for Evidence-Based Interventions in Public-Sector Human Services: A Case Study. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2015; 43(5):675-692. PMC: 4889548. DOI: 10.1007/s10488-015-0681-6. View

2.
Lyon A, Cook C, Brown E, Locke J, Davis C, Ehrhart M . Assessing organizational implementation context in the education sector: confirmatory factor analysis of measures of implementation leadership, climate, and citizenship. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(1):5. PMC: 5759223. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0705-6. View

3.
Torres-Gonzalez F, Ibanez-Casas I, Saldivia S, Ballester D, Grandon P, Moreno-Kustner B . Unmet needs in the management of schizophrenia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2014; 10:97-110. PMC: 3897352. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S41063. View

4.
Aarons G, Ehrhart M, Farahnak L, Hurlburt M . Leadership and organizational change for implementation (LOCI): a randomized mixed method pilot study of a leadership and organization development intervention for evidence-based practice implementation. Implement Sci. 2015; 10:11. PMC: 4310135. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0192-y. View

5.
Powell B, Beidas R, Lewis C, Aarons G, McMillen J, Proctor E . Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2015; 44(2):177-194. PMC: 4761530. DOI: 10.1007/s11414-015-9475-6. View