State of the Science: A Scoping Review and Gap Analysis of Diabetes Online Communities

Overview

Journal J Diabetes Sci Technol

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2019 Mar 12

PMID 30854884

Citations 46

Authors

Michelle L Litchman

Heather R Walker

Ashley H Ng

Sarah E Wawrzynski

Sean M Oser

Deborah A Greenwood

Perry M Gee

Mellanye Lackey

Tamara K Oser

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Individuals with diabetes are using online resources to engage in diabetes online communities to find diabetes-related support and information. The benefits and consequences of DOC (diabetes online community) use are unclear. This scoping review aims to map existing research focused on organic DOCs in which individuals affected by diabetes are interacting with peers.

Method: A scoping review was conducted to comprehensively report and synthesize relevant literature published prior to 2018. Attention was paid to variations in study design, DOC user and platform characteristics, and potential or actual benefits and consequences.

Results: Of the 14 486 titles identified, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in this scoping review. No overt definition of the DOC could be identified. Perceived or actual benefits associated with DOC use can be broadly categorized as clinical, behavioral, psychosocial and community outcomes. Perceived, potential, or actual consequences associated with DOC use were categorized as quality of information, risky behavior exploration, acute concerns, psychosocial, privacy, and inactivity.

Conclusions: The results of this review strongly suggest DOC use is highly beneficial with relatively few negative consequences. DOC use is an emerging area of research and research gaps exist. Future research should seek to identify benefits and consequences to DOC use in experimental trials.

Citing Articles

A systematic literature review on how consumer and community involvement have shaped and influenced pre-pregnancy care interventions for women with diabetes.

Hicks R, Dune T, Gu V, Simmons D, MacMillan F BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):748.

PMID: 39538160 PMC: 11562801. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06951-9.

Impact of Digitally Enabled Peer Support Interventions on Diabetes Distress and Depressive Symptoms in People Living with Type 1 Diabetes: A Systematic Review.

Yakubu T, Pawer S, West N, Tang T, Gorges M Curr Diab Rep. 2024; 25(1):1.

PMID: 39470851 DOI: 10.1007/s11892-024-01560-4.

Preferences for Peer Support Amongst Families Engaged in Paediatric Screening Programmes: The Perspectives of Parents Involved in Screening for Type 1 Diabetes in Children Aged 3-13.

Litchfield I, Quinn L, Boardman F, Boiko O, Narendran P, Choundhary S Health Expect. 2024; 27(4):e70007.

PMID: 39189410 PMC: 11348000. DOI: 10.1111/hex.70007.

Development and Validation of a Measure for Seeking Health Information in the Diabetes Online Community: Mixed Methods Study.

Hughes A, Beach S, Vasistha S, Heydarian N, Morera O JMIR Diabetes. 2024; 9:e55424.

PMID: 38963699 PMC: 11258518. DOI: 10.2196/55424.

Experiences and Views of Young People and Health Care Professionals of Using Social Media to Self-Manage Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies.

Ma Y, Law K, Hassan L, Nenadic G, van der Veer S JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2024; 7:e56919.

PMID: 38809591 PMC: 11170052. DOI: 10.2196/56919.

References

Thomas N, Jones S, Weedon M, Shields B, Oram R, Hattersley A . Frequency and phenotype of type 1 diabetes in the first six decades of life: a cross-sectional, genetically stratified survival analysis from UK Biobank. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017; 6(2):122-129. PMC: 5805861. DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30362-5. View

Rasmussen B, Dunning P, OConnell B . Young women with diabetes: using Internet communication to create stability during life transitions. J Clin Nurs. 2007; 16(3A):17-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01657.x. View

Warshaw H, Edelman D . Building Bridges Through Collaboration and Consensus: Expanding Awareness and Use of Peer Support and Peer Support Communities Among People With Diabetes, Caregivers, and Health Care Providers. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018; 13(2):206-212. PMC: 6399793. DOI: 10.1177/1932296818807689. View

Dias A, Chomutare T, Botsis T . Exploring the community structure of a diabetes forum. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2012; 180:833-7. View

Powers M, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell M, Fischl A . Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Clin Diabetes. 2016; 34(2):70-80. PMC: 4833481. DOI: 10.2337/diaclin.34.2.70. View

Armstrong R, Hall B, Doyle J, Waters E . Cochrane Update. 'Scoping the scope' of a cochrane review. J Public Health (Oxf). 2011; 33(1):147-50. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdr015. View

Lee A, Piette J, Heisler M, Rosland A . Diabetes Distress and Glycemic Control: The Buffering Effect of Autonomy Support From Important Family Members and Friends. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(6):1157-1163. PMC: 5961390. DOI: 10.2337/dc17-2396. View

Powell D, Keil M, Brenner D, Lim L, Markman E . Misleading Health Consumers Through Violations of Communicative Norms: A Case Study of Online Diabetes Education. Psychol Sci. 2018; 29(7):1104-1112. DOI: 10.1177/0956797617753393. View

Wu T, Deng Z, Feng Z, Gaskin D, Zhang D, Wang R . The Effect of Doctor-Consumer Interaction on Social Media on Consumers' Health Behaviors: Cross-Sectional Study. J Med Internet Res. 2018; 20(2):e73. PMC: 5852273. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.9003. View

10.

Liu N, Brown A, Folias A, Younge M, Guzman S, Close K . Stigma in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes. Clin Diabetes. 2017; 35(1):27-34. PMC: 5241772. DOI: 10.2337/cd16-0020. View

11.

Tai-Seale M, McGuire T, Zhang W . Time allocation in primary care office visits. Health Serv Res. 2007; 42(5):1871-94. PMC: 2254573. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x. View

12.

Helgeson V, Mascatelli K, Reynolds K, Becker D, Escobar O, Siminerio L . Friendship and romantic relationships among emerging adults with and without type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2014; 40(3):359-72. PMC: 4366445. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsu069. View

13.

Sparud-Lundin C, Ranerup A, Berg M . Internet use, needs and expectations of web-based information and communication in childbearing women with type 1 diabetes. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011; 11:49. PMC: 3141376. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-49. View

14.

Fergie G, Hilton S, Hunt K . Young adults' experiences of seeking online information about diabetes and mental health in the age of social media. Health Expect. 2015; 19(6):1324-1335. PMC: 5139057. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12430. View

15.

Litchman M, Rothwell E, Edelman L . The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health. Patient Educ Couns. 2017; 101(3):518-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.023. View

16.

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

17.

Toobert D, Hampson S, Glasgow R . The summary of diabetes self-care activities measure: results from 7 studies and a revised scale. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23(7):943-50. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.943. View

18.

Mogi Y, Abedin T, Ahmed S, Gill G, Al Mamun M, Kanda H . Social Networking Sites for Peer-Driven Health Communication: Diabetes-Related Communities in Google. Diabetol Int. 2019; 8(3):323-327. PMC: 6224897. DOI: 10.1007/s13340-017-0311-5. View

19.

Liu Y, Mei Q, Hanauer D, Zheng K, Lee J . Use of Social Media in the Diabetes Community: An Exploratory Analysis of Diabetes-Related Tweets. JMIR Diabetes. 2018; 1(2):e4. PMC: 6238851. DOI: 10.2196/diabetes.6256. View

20.

Oser T, Oser S, McGinley E, Stuckey H . A Novel Approach to Identifying Barriers and Facilitators in Raising a Child With Type 1 Diabetes: Qualitative Analysis of Caregiver Blogs. JMIR Diabetes. 2018; 2(2):e27. PMC: 6238834. DOI: 10.2196/diabetes.8966. View