» Articles » PMID: 30850853

Some Binocular Advantages for Planning Reach, but Not Grasp, Components of Prehension

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2019 Mar 10
PMID 30850853
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Proficient (fast, accurate, precise) hand actions for reaching-to-grasp 3D objects are known to benefit significantly from the use of binocular vision compared to one eye alone. We examined whether these binocular advantages derive from increased reliability in encoding the goal object's properties for feedforward planning of prehension movements or from enhanced feedback mediating their online control. Adult participants reached for, precision grasped and lifted cylindrical table-top objects (two sizes, 2 distances) using binocular vision or only their dominant/sighting eye or their non-dominant eye to program and fully execute their movements or using each of the three viewing conditions only to plan their reach-to-grasp during a 1 s preview, with vision occluded just before movement onset. Various kinematic measures of reaching and grasping proficiency, including corrective error rates, were quantified and compared by view, feedback and object type. Some significant benefits of binocular over monocular vision when they were just available for pre-movement planning were retained for the reach regardless of target distance, including higher peak velocities, straighter paths and shorter low velocity approach times, although these latter were contaminated by more velocity corrections and by poorer coordination with object contact. By contrast, virtually all binocular advantages for grasping, including improvements in peak grip aperture scaling, the accuracy and precision of digit placements at object contact and shorter grip application times preceding the lift, were eliminated with no feedback available, outcomes that were influenced by the object's size. We argue that vergence cues can improve the reliability of binocular internal representations of object distance for the feedforward programming of hand transport, whereas the major benefits of binocular vision for enhancing grasping performance derive exclusively from its continuous presence online.

Citing Articles

Sensorimotor adaptation reveals systematic biases in 3D perception.

Lim C, Vishwanath D, Domini F Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):3847.

PMID: 39885329 PMC: 11782619. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88214-x.


Deficits in Reach Planning and On-Line Grasp Control in Adults With Amblyopia.

Grant S, Conway M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(14):45.

PMID: 38032338 PMC: 10691391. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.45.


Stereoptic serious games as a visual rehabilitation tool for individuals with a residual amblyopia (AMBER trial): a protocol for a crossover randomized controlled trial.

Simon-Martinez C, Antoniou M, Bouthour W, Bavelier D, Levi D, Backus B BMC Ophthalmol. 2023; 23(1):220.

PMID: 37198558 PMC: 10190050. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-02944-y.


The role of binocular vision in the control and development of visually guided upper limb movements.

Niechwiej-Szwedo E, Colpa L, Wong A Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 378(1869):20210461.

PMID: 36511416 PMC: 9745875. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0461.


Temporal Eye-Hand Coordination During Visually Guided Reaching in 7- to 12-Year-Old Children With Strabismus.

Kelly K, Norouzi D, Nouredanesh M, Jost R, Cheng-Patel C, Beauchamp C Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2022; 63(12):10.

PMID: 36350622 PMC: 9652716. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.12.10.


References
1.
Tresilian J, Mon-Williams M, Kelly B . Increasing confidence in vergence as a cue to distance. Proc Biol Sci. 1999; 266(1414):39-44. PMC: 1689642. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0601. View

2.
Brenner E, van Damme W . Perceived distance, shape and size. Vision Res. 1999; 39(5):975-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(98)00162-x. View

3.
Smeets J, Brenner E . A new view on grasping. Motor Control. 1999; 3(3):237-71. DOI: 10.1123/mcj.3.3.237. View

4.
Mon-Williams M, Dijkerman H . The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension. Exp Brain Res. 1999; 128(4):578-82. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050885. View

5.
Murata A, Gallese V, Luppino G, Kaseda M, Sakata H . Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. J Neurophysiol. 2000; 83(5):2580-601. DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.83.5.2580. View