» Articles » PMID: 30847292

Evaluation of Success Criteria for Temporomandibular Joint Arthrocentesis

Overview
Date 2019 Mar 9
PMID 30847292
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to use four sets of success criteria to evaluate the outcomes of arthrocentesis treatment with hyaluronic acid injection in patients with internal derangement (ID) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ).

Materials And Methods: The study included 40 patients diagnosed with unilateral Wilkes stage III TMJ dysfunction. Clinical parameters, including maximum mouth opening (MMO) and pain during function, were evaluated preoperatively, 6 months, and 1 year after TMJ arthrocentesis. Outcomes were assessed and compared using four sets of success criteria from the following: the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS; MMO ≥35 mm and visual analogue scale [VAS] score ≤3), Murakami et al.'s criteria (MMO >38 mm and VAS score <2), Emshoff and Rudisch criteria (MMO ≥35 mm and >50% pain reduction), and patient self-reports (self-evaluation of treatment as successful or unsuccessful).

Results: Significant improvements in MMO and pain reduction during function were observed between the preoperative period and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively (<0.01). The success rates of treatment determined using AAOMS (52.5%), Emshoff and Rudisch criteria (57.5%), and self-reported patient criteria (40.0%) were similar. Application of the Murakami et al. criteria reported the lowest success rate (12.5%).

Conclusion: The AAOMS and Emshoff and Rudisch criteria are consistent with patient expectations and can be used to assess treatment efficacy.

Citing Articles

Response to the letter regarding prolotherapy in temporomandibular disorders.

Ku J J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025; 51(1):69-70.

PMID: 40017078 PMC: 11880668. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2025.51.1.69.


Efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy on temporomandibular disorder: a retrospective study.

Park J, Ku J, Kim Y, Yun P J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024; 50(5):259-264.

PMID: 39482101 PMC: 11535124. DOI: 10.5125/jkaoms.2024.50.5.259.

References
1.
Alpaslan G, Alpaslan C . Efficacy of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis with and without injection of sodium hyaluronate in treatment of internal derangements. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59(6):613-8; discussion 618-9. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.23368. View

2.
Warren M, Fried J . Temporomandibular disorders and hormones in women. Cells Tissues Organs. 2001; 169(3):187-92. DOI: 10.1159/000047881. View

3.
Holmlund A, Axelsson S, Gynther G . A comparison of discectomy and arthroscopic lysis and lavage for the treatment of chronic closed lock of the temporomandibular joint: a randomized outcome study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 59(9):972-7; discussion 977-8. DOI: 10.1053/joms.2001.25818. View

4.
Alpaslan C, Dolwick M, Heft M . Five-year retrospective evaluation of temporomandibular joint arthrocentesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 32(3):263-7. DOI: 10.1054/ijom.2003.0371. View

5.
Nitzan D . Rationale and indications for arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint. Alpha Omegan. 2003; 96(2):57-63. View