» Articles » PMID: 30844502

The Presence of Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Bft Genes As Well As Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Bacteroides Fragilis Strains Isolated from Inpatients of the Infant Jesus Teaching Hospital, Warsaw During 2007-2012

Overview
Journal Anaerobe
Date 2019 Mar 8
PMID 30844502
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess drug susceptibility of clinical B. fragilis strains and to determine any correlation between drug resistance and the presence of specific genes. Antimicrobial susceptibility was assessed using E-tests. All isolates were analyzed with the PCR technique for the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (cepA, cfxA, cfiA, ermF, ermB, ermG, nim), insertion sequences elements (IS1186, IS1187, IS1188, IS942), and enterotoxin-encoding genes (bft). Susceptibility tests yielded the following rates of resistance to the evaluated antibiotics: penicillin G (100%), clindamycin (22.5%), cefoxitin (6.3%), amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (1.8%). All strain were susceptible to imipenem, and metronidazole. The following antibiotic resistance genes were detected in the evaluated isolates: cepA (in 96.4% of isolates), cfxA (in 12.6%), cfiA (in 1.8%), and ermF (in 25.2%). Genes ermB, ermG, and nim were not found. The presence of the cepA gene showed no correlation with the penicillin G MIC. However, we observed a high correlation between cefoxitin MIC values and the presence of gene cfxA as well as a nearly complete correlation between clindamycin MIC values and the presence of gene ermF. The presence of a bft gene was detected in 14.4% of the analyzed B. fragilis isolates; with the bft-1 allele found in 75%, bft-2 in 25%, and bft-3 in none of the isolates. Antibiotic susceptibility profiles of enterotoxin gene-positive isolates in our study did not differ from those of enterotoxin gene-negative isolates.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic Potential of SNBF-1 as a Next-Generation Probiotic: In Vitro Efficacy in Lipid and Carbohydrate Metabolism and Antioxidant Activity.

Cang W, Li X, Tang J, Wang Y, Mu D, Wu C Foods. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38472847 PMC: 10931439. DOI: 10.3390/foods13050735.


Antibiotic Resistance and Mechanisms of Pathogenic Bacteria in Tubo-Ovarian Abscess.

Tang H, Zhou H, Zhang R Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12:958210.

PMID: 35967860 PMC: 9363611. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.958210.


Clinico-microbiological profile of with focus on molecular detection of emerging resistance.

Gupta A, Shenoy P, Kumar A, Chawla K Indian J Med Res. 2022; 154(5):750-756.

PMID: 35532593 PMC: 9210524. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_2568_19.


Comparison of Phenotypic and Genotypic Patterns of Antimicrobial-Resistant Group Isolated from Healthy Individuals in Vietnam and Japan.

Vu H, Hayashi M, Nguyen T, Khong D, Tran H, Yamamoto Y Infect Drug Resist. 2021; 14:5313-5323.

PMID: 34924764 PMC: 8674666. DOI: 10.2147/IDR.S341571.


What we actually know about the pathogenicity of Bacteroides pyogenes.

Majewska A, Kierzkowska M, Kawecki D Med Microbiol Immunol. 2021; 210(2-3):157-163.

PMID: 33934237 PMC: 8137477. DOI: 10.1007/s00430-021-00709-2.