» Articles » PMID: 30844467

The Impact of a Structured Education and Treatment Programme (FLASH) for People with Diabetes Using a Flash Sensor-based Glucose Monitoring System: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2019 Mar 8
PMID 30844467
Citations 31
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Flash sensor-based glucose monitoring (FSGM) provides people with diabetes considerably more information on their glycaemic control. We have developed and evaluated a structured education and treatment programme, termed FLASH, to assist FSGM users to understand and use the available glycaemic information for optimization of their diabetes treatment.

Methods: We report on a multi-centre, randomized, parallel trial with a six-month follow-up involving 216 eligible participants (16-75 years old) on intensive insulin therapy. The primary outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to six months. Secondary outcomes were measures of glucose control as assessed by FSGM, as well as changes in behavioural and psychosocial measures.

Results: At six months, the between-group difference in HbA1c reduction was significant, favouring FLASH education compared to the control group receiving no FLASH education (-0.28%, 95% CI -0.16% to -0.40% vs.-0.11%, 95% CI 0.00% to -0.22%; with a between-group difference of -0.17%, 95% CI -0.01% to -0.33%; p = 0.033). Participation in FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in time spent in the target glucose range, in diabetes-related distress scores and in satisfaction with the glucose monitoring method. FLASH education also resulted in significant improvements in the use of glycaemic information provided by FSGM and in reduced self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) fingerstick testing.

Conclusion: FLASH is an effective programme to improve glycaemic control and lower diabetes-related distress in users of FSGM. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials: NCT03175315.

Citing Articles

The Utility of Smart Multiple Daily Injection Systems in Intensive Insulin-Treated People With Diabetes: An Italian Expert Consensus.

Giorgino F, Bonfanti R, Castaldo F, Irace C, Laurenzi A, Maffeis C J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968251316577.

PMID: 39927665 PMC: 11811948. DOI: 10.1177/19322968251316577.


Improved Glycemic Control in Insulin-Treated Individuals With Poorly Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Through Combined Structured Education With Real-Time Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Yoo J, Jun J, Kwak S, Kim J J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025; :19322968241306136.

PMID: 39754348 PMC: 11699545. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241306136.


Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in patient management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: an umbrella review of systematic reviews from 2011 to 2024.

Tan Y, Suan E, Koh G, Suhairi S, Tyagi S Arch Public Health. 2024; 82(1):231.

PMID: 39623499 PMC: 11610123. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01459-2.


How to Use Continuous Glucose Monitoring Efficiently in Diabetes Management: Opinions and Recommendations by German Experts on the Status and Open Questions.

Thomas A, Haak T, Tombek A, Kulzer B, Ehrmann D, Kordonouri O J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241267768.

PMID: 39129243 PMC: 11571508. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241267768.


A Nutrition-Focused Approach During Continuous Glucose Monitoring Initiation in People With Type 2 Diabetes: Using a Theoretical Framework to Unite Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Food Choices.

Willis H, Johnson E, JaKa M J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024; :19322968241247559.

PMID: 38666635 PMC: 11571590. DOI: 10.1177/19322968241247559.