Correlation Between Olfactory Function, Trigeminal Sensitivity, and Nasal Anatomy in Healthy Subjects

Overview

Journal Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol

Specialty Otorhinolaryngology

Date 2019 Mar 8

PMID 30843174

Citations 19

Authors

Carla Masala

C Kaehling

F Fall

T Hummel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Few studies have investigated the correlation between chemosensory function (trigeminal and olfactory) and nasal volume in humans, even though nasal anatomy is crucial for the sense of smell. Aim of this study was to evaluate these correlations in normosmic subjects.

Methods: Two hundred and fifty-six healthy volunteers (age range 19-69 years) participated. Olfactory function was investigated for (the rose-like) phenylethyl alcohol odor threshold and odor identification (OI) using the Sniffin' Sticks test, while nasal structure was evaluated by acoustic rhinometry (AR); trigeminal sensitivity was assessed in terms of detection "thresholds" for the odorless carbon dioxide (CO).

Results: There were negative correlations between olfactory sensitivity at threshold level and minimum cross-sectional area (MCSA) in both nostrils. No significant correlations were found between OI and nasal anatomy. Similar to olfactory sensitivity, with regard to the trigeminal stimulus CO for the right nostril subjects were the more sensitive the smaller the MCSA.

Conclusions: The current results emphasize the significance of nasal anatomy for trigeminal/olfactory threshold perception. Interestingly, correlations were not found between suprathreshold odor identification and nasal anatomy. Other than odor identification, odor thresholds appear to depend on subtle differences in nasal anatomy.

Citing Articles

Neuroimaging evaluations of olfactory, gustatory, and neurological deficits in patients with long-term sequelae of COVID-19.

Masala C, Porcu M, Orofino G, Defazio G, Pinna I, Solla P Brain Imaging Behav. 2024; 18(6):1480-1490.

PMID: 39340624 PMC: 11680602. DOI: 10.1007/s11682-024-00936-0.

Olfactory Function as a Potential Predictor of Cognitive Impairment in Men and Women.

Masala C, Loy F, Pinna I, Manis N, Ercoli T, Solla P Biology (Basel). 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39056696 PMC: 11274230. DOI: 10.3390/biology13070503.

Correlations between Gustatory, Olfactory, Cognitive Function, and Age in Healthy Women.

Sanna F, Castelli M, Mostallino R, Loy F, Masala C Nutrients. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 38892664 PMC: 11175123. DOI: 10.3390/nu16111731.

Hyposmia correlates with axial signs and gait disorder in Parkinson's disease: an Italian Olfactory Identification Test study.

Tambasco N, Mechelli A, Nigro P, Simoni S, Paoletti F, Eusebi P Neurol Sci. 2024; 45(8):3791-3798.

PMID: 38499888 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07462-3.

Sex Differences in the Bitterness Perception of an Aromatic Myrtle Bitter Liqueur and Bitter Compounds.

Rosa A, Pinna I, Piras A, Porcedda S, Masala C Nutrients. 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37432169 PMC: 10181268. DOI: 10.3390/nu15092030.

References

Hummel T, Kaehling C, Grosse F . Automated assessment of intranasal trigeminal function. Rhinology. 2016; 54(1):27-31. DOI: 10.4193/Rhino15.002. View

Hornung D, Leopold D . Relationship between uninasal anatomy and uninasal olfactory ability. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999; 125(1):53-8. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.125.1.53. View

Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen C . Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000; 257(4):205-11. DOI: 10.1007/s004050050223. View

Konstantinidis I, Gartz I, Gerber J, Reden J, Hummel T . Anatomy of the nasal cavity determines intranasal trigeminal sensitivity. Rhinology. 2010; 48(1):18-22. DOI: 10.4193/Rhin09.060. View

Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A . Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2006; 264(3):237-43. DOI: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. View

Damm M, Vent J, Schmidt M, Theissen P, Eckel H, Lotsch J . Intranasal volume and olfactory function. Chem Senses. 2002; 27(9):831-9. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.831. View

Loftus P, Wise S, Nieto D, Panella N, Aiken A, DelGaudio J . Intranasal volume increases with age: Computed tomography volumetric analysis in adults. Laryngoscope. 2016; 126(10):2212-5. DOI: 10.1002/lary.26064. View

Klimek L, Hummel T, Moll B, Kobal G, Mann W . Lateralized and bilateral olfactory function in patients with chronic sinusitis compared with healthy control subjects. Laryngoscope. 1998; 108(1 Pt 1):111-4. DOI: 10.1097/00005537-199801000-00021. View

. Correlations of nasal symptoms and signs in random sampling study. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1974; 318:1-48. DOI: 10.3109/00016487409129567. View

10.

Hong S, Leopold D, Oliverio P, Benson M, Mellits D, Quaskey S . Relation between CT scan findings and human sense of smell. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998; 118(2):183-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0194-5998(98)80008-9. View

11.

Doty R, Smith R, McKeown D, Raj J . Tests of human olfactory function: principal components analysis suggests that most measure a common source of variance. Percept Psychophys. 1994; 56(6):701-7. DOI: 10.3758/bf03208363. View

12.

Hummel T, Pauli E, Schuler P, Kettenmann B, Stefan H, Kobal G . Chemosensory event-related potentials in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia. 1995; 36(1):79-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1157.1995.tb01670.x. View

13.

Zatorre R, Jones-Gotman M . Right-nostril advantage for discrimination of odors. Percept Psychophys. 1990; 47(6):526-31. DOI: 10.3758/bf03203105. View

14.

Hornung D, Chin C, Kurtz D, Kent P, Mozell M . Effect of nasal dilators on perceived odor intensity. Chem Senses. 1997; 22(2):177-80. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/22.2.177. View

15.

Altundag A, Salihoglu M, Tekeli H, Saglam M, Cayonu M, Hummel T . Lateralized differences in olfactory function and olfactory bulb volume relate to nasal septum deviation. J Craniofac Surg. 2014; 25(2):359-62. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000617. View

16.

MASING H . [Experimental studies on the flow in a nose model]. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd. 1967; 189(4):371-81. View

17.

Clement P, Gordts F . Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. Rhinology. 2005; 43(3):169-79. View

18.

Eccles R . Nasal airflow in health and disease. Acta Otolaryngol. 2000; 120(5):580-95. DOI: 10.1080/000164800750000388. View

19.

Schaefer M, Bottger B, Silver W, Finger T . Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb: a potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli. J Comp Neurol. 2002; 444(3):221-6. DOI: 10.1002/cne.10143. View

20.

Stone H, Rebert C . Observations on trigeminal olfactory interactions. Brain Res. 1970; 21(1):138-42. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90030-2. View