» Articles » PMID: 30837636

Changes in Separate Renal Function in Patients Who Underwent Minimally Invasive Renal Stone Surgery According to the Preoperative Functional Deterioration

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2019 Mar 7
PMID 30837636
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The significant predictors for the postoperative deterioration of separate renal function after minimally invasive stone surgery were investigated in the present prospective and observational study. A total of 117 consecutive patients who underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal calculi >10 mm were included in the present study. Perioperative changes in separate renal function were evaluated with Technetium-99m-Diethylene TriaminePenta acetic acid scan prior to intervention and at postoperative 3 months. Based on the functional differences between bilateral renal units, deterioration of separate renal function was graded into the following three groups: normal deterioration (<10%), moderate deterioration (10-20%), and severe deterioration (>20%). A total of 46 patients had a normal separate renal function, while 71 (60.7%) showed abnormal separate function in the involved side, including 29 (24.8%) moderate and 42 (35.9%) severe deterioration. Postoperatively, 48 patients (41.0%) showed aggravation or no recovery of separate renal function. Of the 46 patients with normal separate function, only 9 patients (19.5%) showed postoperative aggravation. Patients with moderate and severe deterioration showed aggravation (n = 7, 24.1%) or no recovery of separate renal function (n = 32, 76.1%, P < 0.001). Preoperative severe deterioration of separate renal function was an independent significant predictor for the postoperative deterioration of renal function (OR: 9.09, 95% CI: 4.007-20.624, P < 0.001). Lower preoperative deterioration of separate renal function showed a high probability of functional recovery. Therefore, it is hypothesized that early intervention might be necessary in cases where the patient exhibits severe aggravation of renal function.

Citing Articles

Retrograde intrarenal surgery with central neuraxial blockade versus general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Patil A, Patel A, Pande B Saudi J Anaesth. 2024; 18(2):231-239.

PMID: 38654871 PMC: 11033904. DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_16_24.


A Newly Developed Hematuria Grading System May Predict the Status of Stone-Free and Acute Pyelonephritis of Minimally Invasive Renal Stone Surgery.

Kim G, Jung G, Suh J, Park J, Cho S J Clin Med. 2023; 12(8).

PMID: 37109157 PMC: 10142515. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12082820.


Influence of anesthesia methods on surgical outcomes and renal function in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: a prospective, randomized controlled study.

Kwon O, Lee J, Park J, Cho M, Son H, Jeong H BMC Anesthesiol. 2019; 19(1):239.

PMID: 31870417 PMC: 6927176. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-019-0901-9.

References
1.
Shoag J, Halpern J, Goldfarb D, Eisner B . Risk of chronic and end stage kidney disease in patients with nephrolithiasis. J Urol. 2014; 192(5):1440-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.117. View

2.
Hoarau N, Martin F, Lebdai S, Chautard D, Culty T, Azzouzi A . Impact of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and intracorporeal lithotripsy on kidney functional outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2015; 41(5):920-6. PMC: 4756968. DOI: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2014.0402. View

3.
Fayad A, Elsheikh M, Mosharafa A, El-Sergany R, Abdel-Rassoul M, Elshenofy A . Effect of multiple access tracts during percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal function: evaluation of risk factors for renal function deterioration. J Endourol. 2014; 28(7):775-9. DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0771. View

4.
Keddis M, Rule A . Nephrolithiasis and loss of kidney function. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2013; 22(4):390-6. PMC: 4074537. DOI: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32836214b9. View

5.
Hamed M . New advances in assessment of the individual renal function in chronic unilateral renal obstruction using functional CT compared to 99mTc-DTPA renal scan. Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2014; 17(2):59-64. DOI: 10.5603/NMR.2014.0018. View