» Articles » PMID: 30837099

Synovial Fluid Viscosity Test is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Mar 7
PMID 30837099
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: So far there is no "gold standard" test for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), compelling clinicians to rely on several serological and synovial fluid tests with no 100% accuracy. Synovial fluid viscosity is one of the parameters defining the rheology properties of synovial fluid. We hypothesized that patients with PJI may have a different level of synovial fluid viscosity and aimed to investigate the sensitivity and specificity of synovial fluid viscosity in detecting PJI.

Methods: This prospective study was initiated to enroll patients undergoing primary and revision arthroplasty. Our cohort consisted of 45 patients undergoing revision for PJI (n = 15), revision for aseptic failure (n = 15), and primary arthroplasty (n = 15). PJI was defined using the Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria. In all patients, synovial fluid viscosity, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and plasma d-dimer levels were measured preoperatively.

Results: The synovial fluid viscosity level was significantly lower (P = .0011) in patients with PJI (7.93 mPa·s, range 3.0-15.0) than in patients with aseptic failure (13.11 mPa·s, range 6.3-20.4). Using Youden's index, 11.80 mPa·s was determined as the optimal threshold value for synovial fluid viscosity for the diagnosis of PJI. Synovial fluid viscosity outperformed CRP, ESR, and plasma d-dimer, with a sensitivity of 93.33% and a specificity of 66.67%.

Conclusion: Synovial fluid viscosity seems to be on the same level of accuracy with CRP, ESR, and d-dimer regarding PJI detection and to be a promising marker for the diagnosis of PJI.

Citing Articles

The potential role of synovial cells in the progression and treatment of osteoarthritis.

Zou Z, Li H, Yu K, Ma K, Wang Q, Tang J Exploration (Beijing). 2023; 3(5):20220132.

PMID: 37933282 PMC: 10582617. DOI: 10.1002/EXP.20220132.


Making the diagnosis in prosthetic joint infection: a European view.

McNally M, Sigmund I, Hotchen A, Sousa R EFORT Open Rev. 2023; 8(5):253-263.

PMID: 37158373 PMC: 10233812. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-23-0044.


Utility of D-dimer in total joint arthroplasty.

Cutter B, Lum Z, Giordani M, Meehan J World J Orthop. 2023; 14(3):90-102.

PMID: 36998388 PMC: 10044320. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v14.i3.90.


Reliable Diagnostic Tests and Thresholds for Preoperative Diagnosis of Non-Inflammatory Arthritis Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review.

Tang H, Xu J, Yuan W, Wang Y, Yue B, Qu X Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(11):2822-2836.

PMID: 36181336 PMC: 9627080. DOI: 10.1111/os.13500.


Potential for supraphysiologic fluid shear stresses in a rat cemented knee replacement model.

Miller M, Hardy W, Oest M, Mann K J Orthop Res. 2022; 41(1):94-103.

PMID: 35332943 PMC: 9509496. DOI: 10.1002/jor.25326.