» Articles » PMID: 30836994

Recruiting General Practitioners for Palliative Care Research in Primary Care: Real-life Barriers Explained

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Mar 7
PMID 30836994
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The implementation of early palliative care within a primary care setting is a recent academic topic. Recruiting General Practitioners (GPs) to participate in a palliative care study can be challenging. The pro-Spinoza project implemented a Care Pathway for Primary Palliative Care in 5 areas in Belgium. During this project, the feasibility of the recruitment of GPs and palliative care patients was evaluated.

Methods: The recruitment process was recorded in detail via an electronic logbook combining quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative recordings included the contact types and the number of contacts with eligible GPs and were analysed descriptively. Qualitative recordings included field notes with feedback from the GPs and other stakeholders and were thematically analysed starting from the Grol and Wensing framework for professional behaviour change.

Results: Of 4065 eligible GPs working in 5 areas under research, 787 GPs (19%) were contacted individually, 398 GPs (9,8%) were contacted face-to-face and most of these 398 GPs showed high interest in the topic. 112 GPs (2,8%) signed the collaboration agreement, but finally only 65 GPs (1,6%) delivered at least a completed baseline-questionnaire. Despite the initial interest in participating, the unpredictable and busy daily workloads of the GPs, as well as inexperience with research protocols, impeded the ability of the GPs to fully engage in the study. This resulted in the high dropout rate. Participating GPs reported that they had underestimated the effort required to effectively participate in the project.

Conclusions: Recruitment of GPs to palliative care research is challenging. Primary care is a vital service to engage in palliative care research however the practical limitations reduce the ability of the service to effectively engage in the research. More research is needed to determine how GPs might be better supported in research.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02266069 , Registered 16th October 2014, retrospectively registered.

Citing Articles

Experiences with implementing advance care planning (ACP-GP) in Belgian general practice in the context of a cluster RCT: a process evaluation using the RE-AIM framework.

Stevens J, Scherrens A, Pype P, Deliens L, De Vleminck A, Pardon K BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):247.

PMID: 38971761 PMC: 11227713. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02510-5.


Barriers to and facilitators of successful implementation of a palliative approach to care in primary care practices: a mixed methods study.

Langley J, Urquhart R, Tschupruk C, Christian E, Warner G BMJ Open. 2024; 14(1):e079234.

PMID: 38296276 PMC: 10831432. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079234.


Complex advance care planning intervention in general practice (ACP-GP): a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Stevens J, Miranda R, Pype P, Eecloo K, Deliens L, De Vleminck A Br J Gen Pract. 2024; 74(739):e78-e87.

PMID: 38253546 PMC: 10824347. DOI: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0022.


Effectiveness of a specialist palliative home care nurse-patient consultation followed by an interprofessional telephone case conference compared with usual care among patients with non-oncological palliative care needs: protocol for the multicentre....

Marx G, Mallon T, Pohontsch N, Schade F, Dams J, Zimansky M BMJ Open. 2022; 12(7):e059440.

PMID: 35879008 PMC: 9330329. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059440.


Provision of end-of-life care in primary care: a survey of issues and outcomes in the Australian context.

Ding J, Johnson C, Saunders C, Licqurish S, Chua D, Mitchell G BMJ Open. 2022; 12(1):e053535.

PMID: 35046002 PMC: 8772411. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053535.


References
1.
Ewing G, Rogers M, Barclay S, McCabe J, Martin A, Todd C . Recruiting patients into a primary care based study of palliative care: why is it so difficult?. Palliat Med. 2004; 18(5):452-9. DOI: 10.1191/0269216304pm905oa. View

2.
Urquhart R, Kotecha J, Kendell C, Martin M, Han H, Lawson B . Stakeholders' views on identifying patients in primary care at risk of dying: a qualitative descriptive study using focus groups and interviews. Br J Gen Pract. 2018; 68(674):e612-e620. PMC: 6104853. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X698345. View

3.
Grol R, Wensing M . What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004; 180(S6):S57-60. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05948.x. View

4.
Janssens A, Teugels L, Kohl S, Michielsen T, Leysen B, van Meerbeeck J . Practical tools for implementing early palliative care in advanced lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 2016; 47(3):1010-2. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00382-2015. View

5.
Pattison M, Romer A . Improving Care Through the End of Life: launching a primary care clinic-based program. J Palliat Med. 2001; 4(2):249-54. DOI: 10.1089/109662101750290335. View