» Articles » PMID: 30830554

Central Tendency Representation and Exemplar Matching in Visual Short-term Memory

Overview
Journal Mem Cognit
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Mar 5
PMID 30830554
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

I address a recent extension of the generalized context model (GCM), a model which excludes prototypes, to the visual short-term memory (VSTM) literature, which is currently deluged with prototype effects. The paper includes a brief review whose aim is to discuss the background and key findings suggesting that prototypes have an obligatory influence on visual short-term memory responses in the same VSTM task that the GCM's random walk extension, EBRW, was extended to account for: Sternberg scanning. I present a new model that incorporates such "central tendency representations" in memory, as well as several other regularities of the literature, and compare its prediction and postdictions to those of the GCM on some unpublished Sternberg scanning data. The GCM cannot account for the pattern in those data without post hoc modifications but the pattern is predicted nicely by the central tendency representation model. Although the new model is certainly wrong, the review and modeling exercise suggest a reconsideration of prototype models may be warranted, at least in the VSTM literature.

Citing Articles

A reduction in self-reported confidence accompanies the recall of memories distorted by prototypes.

Kerren C, Zhao Y, Griffiths B Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):58.

PMID: 39242848 PMC: 11332036. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00108-2.


A direct comparison of central tendency recall and temporal integration in the successive field iconic memory task.

Zepp J, Dube C, Melcher D Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 83(3):1337-1356.

PMID: 33389675 PMC: 7778862. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-020-02187-9.


Tracking prototype and exemplar representations in the brain across learning.

Bowman C, Iwashita T, Zeithamova D Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 33241999 PMC: 7746231. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.59360.

References
1.
Drew S, Chubb C, Sperling G . Precise attention filters for Weber contrast derived from centroid estimations. J Vis. 2010; 10(10):20. DOI: 10.1167/10.10.20. View

2.
Payne L, Sekuler R . The importance of ignoring: Alpha oscillations protect selectivity. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014; 23(3):171-177. PMC: 4266987. DOI: 10.1177/0963721414529145. View

3.
Nosofsky R . Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda's (2000) "Thirty categorization results in search of a model". J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001; 26(6):1735-43. DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.26.6.1735. View

4.
Huang J, Sekuler R . Distortions in recall from visual memory: two classes of attractors at work. J Vis. 2010; 10(2):24.1-27. PMC: 4104522. DOI: 10.1167/10.2.24. View

5.
Zanto T, Sekuler R, Dube C, Gazzaley A . Age-related changes in expectation-based modulation of motion detectability. PLoS One. 2013; 8(8):e69766. PMC: 3739821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069766. View