Nasogastric Compared with Nasoduodenal Feeding in Low Birthweight Infants
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
One hundred successive infants weighing less than 1500 g at birth were allocated alternately to intermittent nasogastric or continuous nasoduodenal feeding regimens. Eighty were appropriate for gestational age, and of these 25 fed successfully by nasogastric tube and 16 tolerated nasoduodenal feeding until 1600 g. No significant differences in either calorie intake or growth rates were identified throughout the seven weeks of the study. Because of the increased complexity and radiological exposure involved with feeding transpylorically, nasogastric feeding may be preferred as a method of feeding the low birthweight infant.
Tanaka S, Namba F, Nagaya K, Yonemoto N, Hirano S, Yanagihara I Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.
PMID: 39767706 PMC: 11673349. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122799.
Transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants.
Watson J, McGuire W Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (2):CD003487.
PMID: 23450542 PMC: 7154386. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003487.pub3.
Systematic review of transpyloric versus gastric tube feeding for preterm infants.
McGuire W, McEwan P Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004; 89(3):F245-8.
PMID: 15102729 PMC: 1721673. DOI: 10.1136/adc.2002.022459.
Scientifically-based strategies for nutrition of the high-risk low birth weight infant.
Neu J, Valentine C, Meetze W Eur J Pediatr. 1990; 150(1):2-13.
PMID: 2127745 DOI: 10.1007/BF01959470.
Macdonald P, Skeoch C, Carse H, Dryburgh F, Alroomi L, Galea P Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67(4 Spec No):429-31.
PMID: 1586185 PMC: 1590483. DOI: 10.1136/adc.67.4_spec_no.429.