» Articles » PMID: 30811518

Modulation of Microbial Communities and Mucosal Gene Expression in Chicken Intestines After Galactooligosaccharides Delivery In Ovo

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2019 Feb 28
PMID 30811518
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intestinal mucosa is the interface between the microbial content of the gut and the host's milieu. The goal of this study was to modulate chicken intestinal microflora by in ovo stimulation with galactooligosaccharides (GOS) prebiotic and to demonstrate the molecular responses of the host. The animal trial was performed on meat-type chickens (Ross 308). GOS was delivered by in ovo injection performed into the air cell on day 12 of egg incubation. Analysis of microbial communities and mucosal gene expression was performed at slaughter (day 42 post-hatching). Chyme (for DNA isolation) and intestinal mucosa (for RNA isolation) from four distinct intestinal segments (duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and caecum) was sampled. The relative abundance of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in DNA isolated from chyme samples was determined using qPCR. On the host side, the mRNA expression of 13 genes grouped into two panels was analysed with RT-qPCR. Panel (1) included genes related to intestinal innate immune responses (IL-1β, IL-10 and IL-12p40, AvBD1 and CATHL2). Panel (2) contained genes involved in intestinal barrier function (MUC6, CLDN1 and TJAP1) and nutrients sensing (FFAR2 and FFAR4, GLUT1, GLUT2 and GLUT5). GOS increased the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in caecum (from 1.3% to 3.9%). Distinct effects of GOS on gene expression were manifested in jejunum and caecum. Cytokine genes (IL-1β, IL-10 and IL-12p40) were up-regulated in the jejunum and caecum of the GOS-treated group. Host defence peptides (AvBD1 and CATHL2) were up-regulated in the caecum of the GOS-treated group. Free fatty acid receptors (FFAR2 and FFAR4) were up-regulated in all three compartments of the intestine (except the duodenum). Glucose transporters were down-regulated in duodenum (GLUT2 and GLUT5) but up-regulated in the hindgut (GLUT1 and GLUT2). In conclusion, GOS delivered in ovo had a bifidogenic effect in adult chickens. It also modulated gene expression related to intestinal immune responses, gut barrier function, and nutrient sensing.

Citing Articles

Inter- and Transgenerational Effects of In Ovo Stimulation with Bioactive Compounds on Cecal Tonsils and Cecal Mucosa Transcriptomes in a Chicken Model.

Ibrahim M, Bednarczyk M, Stadnicka K, Grochowska E Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940944 PMC: 11817890. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031174.


Ontogeny and function of the intestinal epithelial and innate immune cells during early development of chicks: to explore in ovo immunomodulatory nutrition.

Ayalew H, Xu C, Adane A, Sanchez A, Li S, Wang J Poult Sci. 2024; 104(1):104607.

PMID: 39693955 PMC: 11720616. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104607.


Modulatory effects of in ovo delivery of galactooligosaccharide and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum on antioxidant capacity, gene expression, and selected plasma metabolite parameters of broiler chickens.

Mangan M, Poltowicz K, Metges C, Siwek M J Appl Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39666172 DOI: 10.1007/s13353-024-00931-7.


Expression of IL-1β in transgenic enhances the immunogenicity of parasites and promotes mucosal immunity against coccidiosis.

Duan C, Abudureheman T, Wang S, Suo J, Yu Y, Shi F Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1435702.

PMID: 39221251 PMC: 11361970. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1435702.


In-ovo injection of Bacillus subtilis, raffinose, and their combinations enhances hatchability, gut health, nutrient transport- and intestinal function-related genes, and early development of broiler chicks.

Shehata A, Seddek N, Khamis T, Elnesr S, Nouri H, Albasri H Poult Sci. 2024; 103(11):104134.

PMID: 39154607 PMC: 11471093. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104134.


References
1.
Stanley D, Hughes R, Moore R . Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98(10):4301-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-5646-2. View

2.
Conlon M, Bird A . The impact of diet and lifestyle on gut microbiota and human health. Nutrients. 2014; 7(1):17-44. PMC: 4303825. DOI: 10.3390/nu7010017. View

3.
Martin R, Nauta A, Ben Amor K, Knippels L, Knol J, Garssen J . Early life: gut microbiota and immune development in infancy. Benef Microbes. 2011; 1(4):367-82. DOI: 10.3920/BM2010.0027. View

4.
Deplancke B, Gaskins H . Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 73(6):1131S-1141S. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1131S. View

5.
Chen J, Tellez G, Richards J, Escobar J . Identification of Potential Biomarkers for Gut Barrier Failure in Broiler Chickens. Front Vet Sci. 2015; 2:14. PMC: 4672187. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00014. View