» Articles » PMID: 30807968

Understanding Quit Patterns from a Randomized Clinical Trial: Latent Classes, Predictors, and Long-term Abstinence

Overview
Journal Addict Behav
Date 2019 Feb 27
PMID 30807968
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Tobacco dependence treatment is recognized as a dynamic, chronic process comprised of several specific phases. Of these phases, the Cessation phase is the most critical as it has demonstrated the strongest relation to quit success. Yet, little is understood about smoking trajectories during this period. The current study aimed to address gaps in the smoking research literature and advance understanding of the dynamic quit process unique to completing an integrated smoking treatment by evaluating quit behavior during the Cessation phase.

Method: Two hundred and sixty-seven treatment seeking smokers enrolled in a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a novel, integrated smoking cessation treatment (46.1% male; M = 39.25, SD = 13.70) were included in the present study. Repeated-measure latent class analysis was employed to evaluate quit patterns from quit day through day 14 post-quit.

Results: Results supported a four-class solution: Consistent Quitters, Non-Quitters, Relapsers, and Delayed Quitters. Predictors of class membership included age, number of prior quit attempts, motivation to quit smoking, and quit day smoking urges. Moreover, class membership was significantly associated with 6-month abstinence.

Conclusion: Results suggest that there are four relevant classes of quit behavior, each with specific predictor variables including age, motivation to quit, smoking urges, and number of quit attempts, and that these classes relate to long-term abstinence. These results have the potential to inform manualized smoking cessation treatment interventions based on relevant subgroups of quit behavior.

Citing Articles

Smoking relapse reasons among current smokers with previous cessation experience in Shanghai: A cross-sectional study.

Wang R, Shenfan L, Song Y, Wang Q, Zhang R, Kuai L Tob Induc Dis. 2023; 21:96.

PMID: 37492763 PMC: 10364243. DOI: 10.18332/tid/167963.

References
1.
Aguirre C, Madrid J, Leventhal A . Tobacco withdrawal symptoms mediate motivation to reinstate smoking during abstinence. J Abnorm Psychol. 2015; 124(3):623-34. PMC: 4573778. DOI: 10.1037/abn0000060. View

2.
Fagerstrom K . Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011; 14(1):75-8. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntr137. View

3.
Pomerleau C, Carton S, Lutzke M, Flessland K, Pomerleau O . Reliability of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire and the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. Addict Behav. 1994; 19(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1016/0306-4603(94)90049-3. View

4.
Farris S, Zvolensky M, Schmidt N . Smoking-specific experiential avoidance cognition: explanatory relevance to pre- and post-cessation nicotine withdrawal, craving, and negative affect. Addict Behav. 2014; 44:58-64. PMC: 4320024. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.07.026. View

5.
Farris S, Zvolensky M, DiBello A, Schmidt N . Validation of the Avoidance and Inflexibility Scale (AIS) among treatment-seeking smokers. Psychol Assess. 2015; 27(2):467-477. PMC: 4684259. DOI: 10.1037/pas0000059. View