» Articles » PMID: 30804843

Goal Pursuit in Organizational Health Interventions: The Role of Team Climate, Outcome Expectancy, and Implementation Intentions

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2019 Feb 27
PMID 30804843
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In taking a goal pursuit perspective into account, the present study examined associations between the context, process and outcome evaluation of an organizational health intervention (OHI) implemented within 29 teams in a hospital setting. In doing so, team climate for innovation as a context factor was measured at baseline ( = 529). Four to six weeks after baseline, = 250 team representatives participated in a 4-day workshop. During the workshop employees formulated collective goals as action plans to be implemented in the nursing wards. Goal pursuit as a process factor was differentiated into (a) a motivational "goal setting" and (b) a volitional "goal striving" phase. The scale of outcome expectancy (measured after the fourth day of the workshop) was used as an indicator for the goal setting phase. For the operationalization of the goal striving phase, action plans were coded with regard to the proportion of formulated implementation intentions ("if-then plans"). After 6 months, the outcome of the intervention was measured on a retrospective impact scale ( = 385). The results of the multiple regression analysis and of the multilevel analysis show that both team climate and goal pursuit (outcome expectancy and the proportion of if-then plans) were positively related to the perceived impact of the intervention. Furthermore, the results show that the relationship between team climate and the impact of the intervention was mediated by outcome expectancy. The results highlight the contribution of goal theory within context-process-outcome research that leads to a better understanding of when and why OHIs are effective.

Citing Articles

The organizational health components for small-sized health-care organizations: A systematic review.

Hadian S, Yarmohammadian M, Shaarbafchizadeh N J Educ Health Promot. 2023; 12:37.

PMID: 37034860 PMC: 10079190. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1307_21.


A Digital Tool to Build the Capacity of Leaders to Improve Working Conditions Related to Psychological Health and Well-Being in Teams: Intervention Approach, Prototype, and Evaluation Design of the Web-Application "wecoach".

Grimm L, Bauer G, Jenny G Front Public Health. 2021; 8:521355.

PMID: 33425825 PMC: 7793658. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.521355.


Strategic Self-Regulation in Groups: Collective Implementation Intentions Help Cooperate When Cooperation Is Called for.

Thurmer J, Wieber F, Gollwitzer P Front Psychol. 2020; 11:561388.

PMID: 33329189 PMC: 7732645. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561388.


Development of a Generic Workshop Appraisal Scale (WASC) for Organizational Health Interventions and Evaluation.

Fridrich A, Bauer G, Jenny G Front Psychol. 2020; 11:2115.

PMID: 33013537 PMC: 7461960. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02115.

References
1.
Gosling A, Westbrook J, Braithwaite J . Clinical team functioning and IT innovation: a study of the diffusion of a point-of-care online evidence system. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10(3):244-51. PMC: 342047. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M1285. View

2.
Mathisen G, Einarsen S, Jorstad K, Bronnick K . Climate for work group creativity and innovation: Norwegian validation of the team climate inventory (TCI). Scand J Psychol. 2004; 45(5):383-92. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2004.00420.x. View

3.
Semmer N . Job stress interventions and the organization of work. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006; 32(6):515-27. DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1056. View

4.
Murta S, Sanderson K, Oldenburg B . Process evaluation in occupational stress management programs: a systematic review. Am J Health Promot. 2007; 21(4):248-54. DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-21.4.248. View

5.
Jeffcott S, Mackenzie C . Measuring team performance in healthcare: review of research and implications for patient safety. J Crit Care. 2008; 23(2):188-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2007.12.005. View