» Articles » PMID: 30804816

The Influence of Expectancy Level and Personal Characteristics on Placebo Effects: Psychological Underpinnings

Overview
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2019 Feb 27
PMID 30804816
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Placebo effects benefit a wide range of clinical practice, which can be profoundly influenced by expectancy level and personal characteristics. However, research on the issue of whether these factors independently or interdependently affect the placebo effects is still in its infancy. Here, we adopted a 3-day between-subject placebo analgesia paradigm (2-day conditioning and 1-day test) to investigate the influence of expectancy levels (i.e., No, Low, and High) and personal characteristics (i.e., gender, dispositional optimism, and anxiety state) on placebo effects in 120 healthy participants (60 females). Our results showed that the reduction of pain intensity in the test phase was influenced by the interaction between expectancy and gender, as mainly reflected by greater reductions of pain intensity in females at Low expectancy level than females at No/High expectancy levels, and greater reductions of pain intensity in males than in females at High expectancy level. Additionally, the reduction of pain unpleasantness was not only modulated by the interaction between expectancy and gender, but also by the interaction between expectancy and dispositional optimism, as well as the interaction between expectancy and anxiety state. Specifically, participants who were more optimistic in Low expectancy group, or those who were less anxious in High expectancy group showed greater reductions of pain unpleasantness. To sum up, we emphasized on regulating the expectancy level individually based on the assessment of personal characteristics to maximize placebo effects in clinical conditions.

Citing Articles

Placebo effects in functional dyspepsia: Causes and implications for clinical trials.

Jones M, Holtmann G Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023; 35(2):e14527.

PMID: 36592054 PMC: 10078415. DOI: 10.1111/nmo.14527.


Expectations: How and when do they contribute to placebo analgesia?.

Rosenkjaer S, Lunde S, Kirsch I, Vase L Front Psychiatry. 2022; 13:817179.

PMID: 36147975 PMC: 9488555. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.817179.


Patients' Postjudice of Tele-Neurology for Movement Disorders.

Rajapakshe I, Menozzi E, Cunha I, Lees A, Bhatia K, Mulroy E Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2022; 9(4):446-451.

PMID: 35586530 PMC: 9092759. DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.13434.


Associations Between Interindividual Differences, Expectations and Placebo and Nocebo Effects in Itch.

Meeuwis S, van Middendorp H, Veldhuijzen D, Evers A Front Psychol. 2021; 12:781521.

PMID: 34966334 PMC: 8711701. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781521.


The Effect of Expectations on Experiences and Engagement with an Applied Game for Mental Health.

Wols A, Hollenstein T, Lichtwarck-Aschoff A, Granic I Games Health J. 2021; 10(4):207-219.

PMID: 33945326 PMC: 8380792. DOI: 10.1089/g4h.2020.0115.


References
1.
Price D, Milling L, Kirsch I, Duff A, MONTGOMERY G, Nicholls S . An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain. 1999; 83(2):147-56. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00081-0. View

2.
Gear R, Miaskowski C, Gordon N, Paul S, Heller P, Levine J . The kappa opioid nalbuphine produces gender- and dose-dependent analgesia and antianalgesia in patients with postoperative pain. Pain. 1999; 83(2):339-45. DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00119-0. View

3.
Saxon L, Hiltunen A, Hjemdahl P, Borg S . Gender-related differences in response to placebo in benzodiazepine withdrawal: a single-blind pilot study. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2001; 153(2):231-7. DOI: 10.1007/s002130000574. View

4.
Pollo A, Amanzio M, Arslanian A, Casadio C, Maggi G, Benedetti F . Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance. Pain. 2001; 93(1):77-84. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(01)00296-2. View

5.
Averbuch M, Katzper M . Gender and the placebo analgesic effect in acute pain. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2001; 70(3):287-91. DOI: 10.1067/mcp.2001.118366. View