» Articles » PMID: 30801918

Pathological Downstaging As a Novel Endpoint for the Development of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2019 Feb 26
PMID 30801918
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate whether pathological downstaging (pDS) was more informative in predicting overall survival (OS) than pathological complete response (pCR) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC).

Patients And Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with high-grade cN0M0 disease who had received NAC. pDS was defined as a decrease of at least one stage from cT to pT stage along with pN0, including pCR. A multivariable Cox model predicting OS was generated by fitting alternatively either pDS or pCR, and adjusted for potential confounders. The discrimination of the Cox models for predicting OS was evaluated using Harrell's C-index. The analyses were repeated in patients diagnosed as having cT2-4N0M0 disease.

Results: Among 264 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 72 (27%) and 39 (15%) achieved pDS and pCR, respectively. On multivariable analysis, both pDS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13, 0.45; P < 0.001) and pCR (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18, 0.79; P = 0.01) were associated with OS. The model including pDS achieved better discrimination with respect to the model including pCR: C-index 76.4 vs 72.7, respectively. In the 128 patients diagnosed with cT2-4 disease, both pDS (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.09, 0.40; P < 0.001) and pCR (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11, 0.85; P = 0.023) were confirmed as predictors of OS. The model including pDS was confirmed to discriminate better than the model including pCR: C-index 75 vs 68.9, respectively.

Conclusion: The study showed that pDS after NAC for UTUC was more informative than pCR when predicting OS. These findings, although requiring prospective validation, can aid in the design of clinical trials seeking to refine the use of chemotherapy and other systemic therapies in this setting.

Citing Articles

Case report: Radical robotic nephroureterectomy after chemotherapy followed by avelumab in a patient with node-positive UTUC.

Studentova H, Student Jr V, Kurfurstova D, Kopova A, Melichar B Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1465213.

PMID: 39588312 PMC: 11586231. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1465213.


Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in a Double Collecting System Kidney.

Zohar Y, Sivan B, Mintz I, Hefer B, Rouvinov K, Shrem N J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392591 PMC: 10890684. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020158.


Intravesical Therapy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review.

Wang Z, Shi H, Xu Y, Fang Y, Song J, Jiang W Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(20).

PMID: 37894387 PMC: 10605447. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15205020.


Minimally Invasive Radical Nephroureterectomy: 5-Year Update of Techniques and Outcomes.

Franco A, Ditonno F, Feng C, Manfredi C, Sturgis M, Farooqi M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(18).

PMID: 37760553 PMC: 10527300. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184585.


Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma: A Unique Immuno-Molecular Entity and a Clinical Challenge in the Current Therapeutic Scenario.

Mazzaschi G, Giudice G, Coriano M, Campobasso D, Perrone F, Maffezzoli M Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2023; 22:15330338231159753.

PMID: 36855829 PMC: 9983117. DOI: 10.1177/15330338231159753.