» Articles » PMID: 30801257

Improving Nutrition and Activity Behaviors Using Digital Technology and Tailored Feedback: Protocol for the Tailored Diet and Activity (ToDAy) Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Excess weight is a major risk factor for chronic diseases. In Australia, over 60% of adults are overweight or obese. The overconsumption of energy-dense nutrient-poor (EDNP) foods and low physical activity (PA) levels are key factors contributing to population obesity. New cost-effective approaches to improve population diet and PA behaviors are needed.

Objective: This 1-year randomized controlled trial (6-month intervention and 6-month follow-up) aims to investigate whether a tailored intervention using mobile technology can improve diet and PA behaviors leading to weight loss in adults (aged 18-65 years) who are overweight or obese and recruited through a social marketing campaign (LiveLighter).

Methods: All eligible participants will provide data on demographics and lifestyle behaviors online at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Using two-stage randomization, participants will be allocated into one of three conditions (n=200 per group): tailored feedback delivered via email at seven time points, informed by objective dietary (mobile food record app) and activity (wearable activity monitor) assessment; active control receiving no tailored feedback, but undergoing the same objective assessments as tailored feedback; and online control receiving no tailored feedback or objective assessments. Primary outcome measures at 6 and 12 months are changes in body mass, EDNP food and beverage consumption, and daily moderate-to-vigorous PA (measured via accelerometry). Secondary outcomes include change in fruit and vegetable consumption, daily sedentary behaviors, and cost effectiveness.

Results: Enrolment commenced in August 2017. Primary outcomes at 12 months will be available for analysis from September 2019.

Conclusions: Tailored email feedback provided to individuals may deliver a cost-effective strategy to overcome existing barriers to improving diet and PA. If found to be successful and cost effective, upscaling this intervention for inclusion in larger-scale interventions is highly feasible.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000554369; https://www.anzctr.org.au /Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=371325&isReview=true.

International Registered Report Identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/12782.

Citing Articles

Mobile health (m-health) smartphone interventions for adolescents and adults with overweight or obesity.

Metzendorf M, Wieland L, Richter B Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024; 2:CD013591.

PMID: 38375882 PMC: 10877670. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD013591.pub2.


Health and sustainability co-benefits of eating behaviors: Towards a science of dietary eco-wellness.

Barrett B Prev Med Rep. 2022; 28:101878.

PMID: 35832638 PMC: 9272027. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101878.


Demographic and psychosocial correlates of measurement error and reactivity bias in a four-day image-based mobile food record among adults with overweight and obesity.

Whitton C, Healy J, Dhaliwal S, Shoneye C, Harray A, Mullan B Br J Nutr. 2022; :1-39.

PMID: 35587722 PMC: 9899562. DOI: 10.1017/S0007114522001532.


Systematic review of process evaluations of interventions in trials investigating sedentary behaviour in adults.

Johansson J, Lam N, Ozer S, Hall J, Morton S, English C BMJ Open. 2022; 12(1):e053945.

PMID: 35105631 PMC: 8804646. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053945.


A Modern Flexitarian Dietary Intervention Incorporating Web-Based Nutrition Education in Healthy Young Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Braakhuis A, Gillies N, Worthington A, Knowles S, Conner T, Roy R JMIR Res Protoc. 2021; 10(12):e30909.

PMID: 34931994 PMC: 8734916. DOI: 10.2196/30909.


References
1.
Stunkard A, Messick S . The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985; 29(1):71-83. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8. View

2.
Hands B, Chivers P, Parker H, Beilin L, Kendall G, Larkin D . The associations between physical activity, screen time and weight from 6 to 14 yrs: the Raine Study. J Sci Med Sport. 2011; 14(5):397-403. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.03.011. View

3.
Kroeze W, Werkman A, Brug J . A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors. Ann Behav Med. 2006; 31(3):205-23. DOI: 10.1207/s15324796abm3103_2. View

4.
Khaylis A, Yiaslas T, Bergstrom J, Gore-Felton C . A review of efficacious technology-based weight-loss interventions: five key components. Telemed J E Health. 2010; 16(9):931-8. PMC: 3000900. DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2010.0065. View

5.
Boushey C, Harray A, Kerr D, Schap T, Paterson S, Aflague T . How willing are adolescents to record their dietary intake? The mobile food record. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015; 3(2):e47. PMC: 4464313. DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.4087. View