How Recommender Systems Could Support and Enhance Computer-tailored Digital Health Programs: A Scoping Review

Overview

Journal Digit Health

Specialty Medical Informatics

Date 2019 Feb 26

PMID 30800414

Citations 21

Authors

Kei Long Cheung

Dilara Durusu

Xincheng Sui

Hein de Vries

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Tailored digital health programs can promote positive health-related lifestyle changes and have been shown to be (cost) effective in trials. However, such programs are used suboptimally. New approaches are needed to optimise the use of these programs. This paper illustrates the potential of recommender systems to support and enhance computer-tailored digital health interventions. The aim is threefold, to explore: (1) how recommender systems provide health recommendations, (2) to what extent recommender systems incorporate theoretical models and (3) how the use of recommender systems may enhance the usage of computer-tailored interventions.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted, using MEDLINE and ScienceDirect, to identify health recommender systems reported in studies between January 2007 and December 2017. Information was subsequently extracted to understand the potential benefits of recommender systems for computer-tailored digital health programs. Titles and abstracts of 1184 studies were screened for the full-text screening, in which two reviewers independently selected articles and systematically extracted data using a predefined extraction form.

Results: A total of 26 articles were included for data extraction. General characteristics were reported, with eight studies reporting hybrid filtering. A description of how each recommender system provides a recommendation is described; the majority of recommender systems used messages as recommendation. We identified the potential effects of recommender systems on efficiency, effectiveness, trustworthiness and enjoyment of the digital health program.

Conclusions: Incorporating a collaborative method with demographic filtering as a second step to knowledge-based filtering could potentially add value to traditional tailoring with regard to enhancing the user experience. This study illustrates how recommender systems, especially hybrid programs, may have the potential to bring tailored digital health forward.

Citing Articles

Next-generation diabetes diagnosis and personalized diet-activity management: A hybrid ensemble paradigm.

Sajid M, Razzaq Malik K, Haider Khan A, Iqbal S, Alaulamie A, Ilyas Q PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0307718.

PMID: 39775570 PMC: 11709242. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0307718.

Stress Reduction in Perioperative Care: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.

Kondylakis H, Chicchi Giglioli I, Katehakis D, Aldemir H, Zikas P, Papagiannakis G J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27():e54049.

PMID: 39773866 PMC: 11751654. DOI: 10.2196/54049.

Timing, Indicators, and Approaches to Digital Patient Experience Evaluation: Umbrella Systematic Review.

Wang T, Giunti G, Goossens R, Melles M J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e46308.

PMID: 38315545 PMC: 10877490. DOI: 10.2196/46308.

Developing Message Strategies to Engage Racial and Ethnic Minority Groups in Digital Oral Self-Care Interventions: Participatory Co-Design Approach.

Carpenter S, Greer Z, Newman R, Murphy S, Shetty V, Nahum-Shani I JMIR Form Res. 2023; 7:e49179.

PMID: 38079204 PMC: 10750234. DOI: 10.2196/49179.

Effectiveness of Computer-Tailored Health Communication in Increasing Physical Activity in People With or at Risk of Long-Term Conditions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Hao L, Goetze S, Alessa T, Hawley M J Med Internet Res. 2023; 25:e46622.

PMID: 37792469 PMC: 10585448. DOI: 10.2196/46622.

References

de Vries H, Brug J . Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns. 1999; 36(2):99-105. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(98)00127-x. View

Dijkstra A . Working mechanisms of computer-tailored health education: evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res. 2005; 20(5):527-39. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyh014. View

Eysenbach G . The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7(1):e11. PMC: 1550631. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11. View

Buller D, Buller M, Kane I . Web-based strategies to disseminate a sun safety curriculum to public elementary schools and state-licensed child-care facilities. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(5):470-6. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.5.470. View

Swartz L, Noell J, Schroeder S, Ary D . A randomised control study of a fully automated internet based smoking cessation programme. Tob Control. 2006; 15(1):7-12. PMC: 2563640. DOI: 10.1136/tc.2003.006189. View

Bennett G, Glasgow R . The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health. 2009; 30:273-92. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235. View

Brouwer W, Oenema A, Raat H, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, De Vries N . Characteristics of visitors and revisitors to an Internet-delivered computer-tailored lifestyle intervention implemented for use by the general public. Health Educ Res. 2009; 25(4):585-95. DOI: 10.1093/her/cyp063. View

Krebs P, Prochaska J, Rossi J . A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med. 2010; 51(3-4):214-21. PMC: 2939185. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004. View

Moroshko I, Brennan L, OBrien P . Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev. 2011; 12(11):912-34. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x. View

10.

Chomutare T, Arsand E, Hartvigsen G . Mobile peer support in diabetes. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169:48-52. View

11.

Crutzen R, Cyr D, De Vries N . Bringing loyalty to e-Health: theory validation using three internet-delivered interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(3):e73. PMC: 3222180. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1837. View

12.

Honka A, Kaipainen K, Hietala H, Saranummi N . Rethinking health: ICT-enabled services to empower people to manage their health. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2012; 4:119-39. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2011.2174217. View

13.

Crutzen R, Cyr D, De Vries N . The role of user control in adherence to and knowledge gained from a website: randomized comparison between a tunneled version and a freedom-of-choice version. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(2):e45. PMC: 3376511. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1922. View

14.

Davies C, Spence J, Vandelanotte C, Caperchione C, Mummery W . Meta-analysis of internet-delivered interventions to increase physical activity levels. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:52. PMC: 3464872. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-52. View

15.

Kelders S, Kok R, Ossebaard H, van Gemert-Pijnen J . Persuasive system design does matter: a systematic review of adherence to web-based interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(6):e152. PMC: 3510730. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2104. View

16.

Wendel S, Dellaert B, Ronteltap A, van Trijp H . Consumers' intention to use health recommendation systems to receive personalized nutrition advice. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13:126. PMC: 3623628. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-126. View

17.

Hidalgo J, Maqueda E, Risco-Martin J, Cuesta-Infante A, Colmenar J, Nobel J . glUCModel: a monitoring and modeling system for chronic diseases applied to diabetes. J Biomed Inform. 2014; 48:183-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2013.12.015. View

18.

Marlin B, Adams R, Sadasivam R, Houston T . Towards collaborative filtering recommender systems for tailored health communications. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2013:1600-7. PMC: 3900169. View

19.

Giabbanelli P, Crutzen R . Supporting self-management of obesity using a novel game architecture. Health Informatics J. 2014; 21(3):223-36. DOI: 10.1177/1460458214521051. View

20.

Wiesner M, Pfeifer D . Health recommender systems: concepts, requirements, technical basics and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014; 11(3):2580-607. PMC: 3968965. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph110302580. View