» Articles » PMID: 30796676

Plant Approach-Avoidance Response in Locusts Driven by Plant Volatile Sensing at Different Ranges

Overview
Journal J Chem Ecol
Publisher Springer
Date 2019 Feb 24
PMID 30796676
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain how herbivorous insects approach plants by sensing plant volatiles. Insect antennae and maxillary palps are believed to have crucial roles in the detection of host plant volatiles. However, few studies have assessed the roles of these olfactory organs in food selection in terms of the effects of individual volatile compounds from plants at various distances. Therefore, we assessed the palp-opening response (POR), biting response, and selection behavior of locust (Locusta migratoria) nymphs in response to volatile compounds from host and non-host plants at various distances. Thirty odorants were identified as the active volatiles to locust by the POR tests. At a distance of 3 m, locusts were attracted to a few common volatiles (1% v/v) of both host and non-host plants, while few components of volatiles acted as repellants at this distance. At a distance of 1 m, locusts responded more readily to volatile compounds. At a distance of 1 cm, locusts mainly used their palps to detect volatiles. However, some components that acted as attractants at long distances had no effect on the biting response at a short distance. Together, the results suggest that plant volatiles generally attract locust nymphs at long distances, but the effects are influenced by distance and concentration. Moreover, there are substantial functional differences in the use of antennae and palps for detecting volatiles at various distances. Overall, the mechanism of food selection by locusts via olfaction can be divided into several continuous ranges according to the sensitivities of the two chemosensory organs and the characteristics of the plant odorants.

Citing Articles

Synergistic olfactory processing for social plasticity in desert locusts.

Petelski I, Gunzel Y, Sayin S, Kraus S, Couzin-Fuchs E Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):5476.

PMID: 38942759 PMC: 11213921. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-49719-7.


Innate attraction and aversion to odors in locusts.

Ray S, Sun K, Stopfer M PLoS One. 2023; 18(7):e0284641.

PMID: 37428771 PMC: 10332586. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284641.


Sensilla-Specific Expression of Odorant Receptors in the Desert Locust .

Jiang X, Breer H, Pregitzer P Front Physiol. 2019; 10:1052.

PMID: 31507434 PMC: 6714038. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2019.01052.

References
1.
Geier , BOSCH , BOECKH . Influence of odour plume structure on upwind flight of mosquitoes towards hosts . J Exp Biol. 1999; 202 (Pt 12):1639-48. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.202.12.1639. View

2.
De Bruyne M, Clyne P, Carlson J . Odor coding in a model olfactory organ: the Drosophila maxillary palp. J Neurosci. 1999; 19(11):4520-32. PMC: 6782632. View

3.
Blaney W . Behavioural and electrophysiological studies of taste discrimination by the maxillary palps of larvae of Locusta migratoria (L.). J Exp Biol. 1975; 62(3):555-69. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.62.3.555. View

4.
Heil M . Direct defense or ecological costs: responses of herbivorous beetles to volatiles released by wild Lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus). J Chem Ecol. 2004; 30(6):1289-95. DOI: 10.1023/b:joec.0000030299.59863.69. View

5.
Holopainen J . Multiple functions of inducible plant volatiles. Trends Plant Sci. 2004; 9(11):529-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2004.09.006. View